Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use django's undeprecated gettext_lazy #1

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kevr
Copy link

@kevr kevr commented Sep 16, 2022

This commit solves deprecation warnings produced by django.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Morris kevr@0cost.org

This commit solves deprecation warnings produced by django.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Morris <kevr@0cost.org>
@alvindera97
Copy link

alvindera97 commented Nov 2, 2023

I guess the maintainer isn't available anymore 🥲 .... Another solution might be to maintain a fork for the foreseeable future. However I've been asking myself what amount of benefit this package brings apart from approximately O(1) look up times. If there are millions of rows, then maybe I could get the motivation for this. At that point, wouldn't it be better to think of better native O(1) array-like-collection lookup databases/fields?

Or maybe it's somewhere in Postgres's documentation and I've not seen it yet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants