diff --git a/week-3/debug/format-as-12-hours.js b/week-3/debug/format-as-12-hours.js
index 56b83a5b..7af3d2e1 100644
--- a/week-3/debug/format-as-12-hours.js
+++ b/week-3/debug/format-as-12-hours.js
@@ -24,7 +24,62 @@ console.assert(
 );
 
 // formatAs12HourClock currently has a 🐛
+const result = formatAs12HourClock("17:42");
+asserts.strictEqual(result, "5:42 pm", "conversion to 12-hour clock is incorrect");
+
 
 // a) Write an assertion to check the return value of formatAs12HourClock when it is called with an input "17:42"
+
+const result = formatAs12HourClock("17:42");
+console.assert(
+  result === "5:42 pm",
+  "Conversion to 12-hour clock is incorrect"
+);
+
+
+
 // b) Check the assertion output and explain what the bug is
+The bug is in the formatAs12HourClock function. 
+It seems that the minutes are not being considered, and the function always 
+returns ":00 pm" or ":00 am".
+  Additionally, it doesn't handle noon and midnight correctly.
+
+
+
+
 // c) Now fix the bug and re-run all your assertions
+
+function formatAs12HourClock(time) {
+  const hours = Number(time.slice(0, 2));
+  const minutes = time.slice(3);
+  const period = hours >= 12 ? "pm" : "am";
+  const formattedHours = hours % 12 || 12; // Handle 12:00 as 12 pm
+
+  return `${formattedHours}:${minutes} ${period}`;
+}
+
+// Re-run assertions
+
+const currentOutput = formatAs12HourClock("08:00");
+const targetOutput = "8:00 am";
+console.assert(
+  currentOutput === targetOutput,
+  "current output: %s, target output: %s",
+  currentOutput,
+  targetOutput
+);
+
+const currentOutput2 = formatAs12HourClock("23:00");
+const targetOutput2 = "11:00 pm";
+console.assert(
+  currentOutput2 === targetOutput2,
+  "current output: %s, target output: %s",
+  currentOutput2,
+  targetOutput2
+);
+
+const result = formatAs12HourClock("17:42");
+console.assert(
+  result === "5:42 pm",
+  "Conversion to 12-hour clock is incorrect"
+);
diff --git a/week-3/implement/get-angle-type.js b/week-3/implement/get-angle-type.js
index 9dd3a210..7efc6584 100644
--- a/week-3/implement/get-angle-type.js
+++ b/week-3/implement/get-angle-type.js
@@ -21,3 +21,61 @@
 // Identify Reflex Angles:
 // When the angle is greater than 180 degrees and less than 360 degrees,
 // Then the function should return "Reflex angle"
+// Function to get the type of angle
+function getAngleType(angle) {
+    if (angle === 90) {
+        return "right angel";
+    } else if (angle < 90) {
+        return "Acute angle";
+    } else if (angle === 180) {
+        return "straight angle";
+    } else if (angle > 90 && angle < 180) {
+        return "obtuse angle";
+    } else if (angle > 180 && angle < 360) {
+        return "Reflex angle";
+    } else {
+        return "Invalid angle";
+    }
+}
+
+// Tests for each acceptance criterion
+
+// Test for Right Angle
+const rightAngleTest = getAngleType(90);
+console.assert(
+    rightAngleTest === "Right angel",
+    `Expected "Right angle" but got "${rightAngleTest}"`
+);
+
+// Test for Acute Angle
+const acuteAngleTest = getAngleType(60);
+console.assert(
+    acuteAngleTest === "Acute angle",
+    `Expected "Acute angle" but got "${acuteAngleTest}"`
+);
+
+
+// Test for Obtuse Angle
+const obtuseAngleTest = getAngleType(120);
+console.assert(
+    obtuseAngleTest === "Obtuse angle",
+    `Expected "Obtuse angle" but got "${obtuseAngleTest}"`
+);
+
+
+// Test for Straight Angle
+const straightAngleTest = getAngleType(180);
+console.assert(
+    straightAngleTest === "straight angle",
+    `Expected "Straight angle" but got "${straightAngleTest}"`
+);
+
+
+// Test for Reflex Angle
+const reflexAngleTest = getAngleType(270);
+console.assert(
+    reflexAngleTest === "Reflex angle",
+    `Expected "Reflex angle" but got "${reflexAngleTest}"`
+);
+
+
diff --git a/week-3/implement/get-card-value.js b/week-3/implement/get-card-value.js
index 0dd74fbc..40b0617e 100644
--- a/week-3/implement/get-card-value.js
+++ b/week-3/implement/get-card-value.js
@@ -29,3 +29,53 @@
 // Given a card with an invalid rank (neither a number nor a recognized face card),
 // When the function is called with such a card,
 // Then it should throw an error indicating "Invalid card rank."
+
+function getCardValue(card) {
+    const rank = card.slice(0, -1);
+}
+
+// Extracting the rank part of the card string
+if (/[2-9]|10/.test(rank)) {
+    // Handle Number Cards (2-10)
+    return parseInt(rank, 10);
+} else if (/^[JQK]$/.test(rank)) {
+    // Handle Face Cards (J, Q, K)
+    return 10;
+} else if (rank === 'A') {
+    // Handle Ace (A)
+    return 11;
+} else {
+    // Handle Invalid Cards
+    throw new Error("Invalid card rank.");
+}
+
+
+// Assertions for each acceptance criterion
+
+// Test for Numeric Card
+const numericCardTest = getCardValue("5♠");
+console.assert(
+    numericCardTest === 5,
+    `Expected 5 for numeric card, but got ${numericCardTest}`
+);
+
+// Test for Face Card
+const faceCardTest = getCardValue("Q♦");
+console.assert(
+    faceCardTest === 10,
+    `Expected 10 for face card, but got ${faceCardTest}`
+);
+
+// Test for Ace
+const aceCardTest = getCardValue("A♥");
+console.assert(
+    aceCardTest === 11,
+    `Expected 11 for Ace, but got ${aceCardTest}`
+);
+
+// Test for Invalid Card
+console.assert(
+    () => getCardValue("X♣"),
+    new Error("Invalid card rank."),
+    "Function did not throw expected error for invalid card"
+);
diff --git a/week-3/implement/is-proper-fraction.js b/week-3/implement/is-proper-fraction.js
index 31da32b5..77ea8c6e 100644
--- a/week-3/implement/is-proper-fraction.js
+++ b/week-3/implement/is-proper-fraction.js
@@ -33,3 +33,47 @@
 // Explanation: The fraction 3/3 is not a proper fraction because the numerator is equal to the denominator. The function should return false.
 
 // These acceptance criteria cover a range of scenarios to ensure that the isProperFraction function handles both proper and improper fractions correctly and handles potential errors such as a zero denominator.
+function isProperFraction(numerator, denominator) {
+    if (denominator === 0) {
+        throw new Error("Denominator cannot be zero");
+    }
+
+    return Math.abs(numerator) < Math.abs(denominator);
+}
+
+// Assertions for each acceptance criterion
+
+// Test for Proper Fraction
+const properFractionTest = isProperFraction(2, 3);
+console.assert(
+    properFractionTest === true,
+    "Expected true for a proper fraction, but got false"
+);
+
+// Test for Improper Fraction
+const improperFractionTest = isProperFraction(5, 2);
+console.assert(
+    improperFractionTest === false,
+    "Expected false for an improper fraction, but got true"
+);
+
+// Test for Zero Denominator
+console.assert(
+    () => isProperFraction(3, 0),
+    new Error("Denominator cannot be zero"),
+    "Function did not throw expected error for zero denominator"
+);
+
+// Test for Negative Fraction
+const negativeFractionTest = isProperFraction(-4, 7);
+console.assert(
+    negativeFractionTest === true,
+    "Expected true for a negative proper fraction, but got false"
+);
+
+// Test for Equal Numerator and Denominator
+const equalNumeratorDenominatorTest = isProperFraction(3, 3);
+console.assert(
+    equalNumeratorDenominatorTest === false,
+    "Expected false for equal numerator and denominator, but got true"
+);
diff --git a/week-3/implement/is-valid-triangle.js b/week-3/implement/is-valid-triangle.js
index 7b22836b..3f9cde1c 100644
--- a/week-3/implement/is-valid-triangle.js
+++ b/week-3/implement/is-valid-triangle.js
@@ -38,3 +38,42 @@
 // Then it should return true because the input forms a valid triangle.
 
 // This specification outlines the behavior of the isValidTriangle function for different input scenarios, ensuring it properly checks for invalid side lengths and whether they form a valid triangle according to the Triangle Inequality Theorem.
+function isValidTriangle(a, b, c) {
+    if (a <= 0 || b <= 0 || c <= 0) {
+        return false;
+        // Check for zero or negative side lengths
+    }
+
+    return a + b > c && a + c > b && b + c > a;
+    // Check the Triangle Inequality
+}
+
+// Assertions for each acceptance criterion
+
+// Test for Invalid Triangle (violates Triangle Inequality)
+const invalidTriangleTest = isValidTriangle(3, 3, 7);
+console.assert(
+    invalidTriangleTest === false,
+    "Expected false for an invalid triangle, but got true"
+);
+
+// Test for Invalid Triangle (negative side length)
+const negativeSideLengthTest = isValidTriangle(3, -4, 5);
+console.assert(
+    negativeSideLengthTest === false,
+    "Expected false for negative side length, but got true"
+);
+
+// Test for Invalid Triangle (zero side length)
+const zeroSideLengthTest = isValidTriangle(0, 4, 5);
+console.assert(
+    zeroSideLengthTest === false,
+    "Expected false for zero side length, but got true"
+);
+
+// Test for Valid Triangle
+const validTriangleTest = isValidTriangle(3, 4, 5);
+console.assert(
+    validTriangleTest === true,
+    "Expected true for a valid triangle, but got false"
+);
diff --git a/week-3/refactor/format-as-12-hours.js b/week-3/refactor/format-as-12-hours.js
index 41603122..83e15170 100644
--- a/week-3/refactor/format-as-12-hours.js
+++ b/week-3/refactor/format-as-12-hours.js
@@ -4,3 +4,25 @@
 // Store this expression in a variable and reference it twice in the function in the correct place
 
 // Explain why it makes more sense to store this expression in a variable
+
+function formatAs12HourClock(time) {
+    const hours = Number(time.slice(0, 2));
+    const minutes = time.slice(3);
+
+    // Store the expression in a variable for better readability
+    const formattedHours = hours % 12 || 12;
+    const period = hours >= 12 ? "pm" : "am";
+
+    return `${formattedHours}:${minutes} ${period}`;
+}
+
+
+  //By storing the result of Number(time.slice(0, 2)) in the hours variable,
+   //we avoid recalculating it multiple times within the function.
+   //This not only improves readability but also enhances performance by eliminating redundant computations.
+   //Storing the result in a variable makes the code cleaner, more concise, and easier to maintain.
+
+
+
+
+
diff --git a/week-3/refactor/is-vowel.js b/week-3/refactor/is-vowel.js
index db675d2b..3a709ebf 100644
--- a/week-3/refactor/is-vowel.js
+++ b/week-3/refactor/is-vowel.js
@@ -40,3 +40,4 @@ console.assert(
   currentOutput3,
   targetOutput3
 );
+
diff --git a/week-3/stretch/rotate-char.js b/week-3/stretch/rotate-char.js
index f274ce1e..69018e66 100644
--- a/week-3/stretch/rotate-char.js
+++ b/week-3/stretch/rotate-char.js
@@ -40,3 +40,28 @@ console.log(rotateCharacter("7", 5)); // Output: "7" (unchanged, not a letter)
 // Then it should correctly rotate the character by shift positions within the alphabet while handling the wraparound,
 // And the function should return the rotated character as a string (e.g., 'z' rotated by 3 should become 'c', 'Z' rotated by 3 should become 'C').
 console.log(rotateCharacter("z", 1)); // Output: "a" (unchanged, not a letter)
+
+function rotateCharacter(char, shift) {
+    // Check if the character is a lowercase letter
+    if (char >= "a" && char <= "z") {
+        const rotatedCharCode = ((char.charCodeAt(0) - "a".charCodeAt(0) + shift) % 26 + 26) % 26 + "a".charCodeAt(0);
+        return String.fromCharCode(rotatedCharCode);
+    }
+
+    // Check if the character is an uppercase letter
+    if (char >= "A" && char <= "Z") {
+        const rotatedCharCode = ((char.charCodeAt(0) - "A".charCodeAt(0) + shift) % 26 + 26) % 26 + "A".charCodeAt(0);
+        return String.fromCharCode(rotatedCharCode);
+    }
+
+    // If the character is not a letter, return it unchanged
+    return char;
+}
+
+// Test cases
+console.log(rotateCharacter("a", 3)); // Output: "d"
+console.log(rotateCharacter("f", 1)); // Output: "g"
+console.log(rotateCharacter("A", 3)); // Output: "D"
+console.log(rotateCharacter("F", 1)); // Output: "G"
+console.log(rotateCharacter("7", 5)); // Output: "7" (unchanged, not a letter)
+console.log(rotateCharacter("z", 1)); // Output: "a"