This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 19, 2021. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
/
component.yaml
12688 lines (11113 loc) · 405 KB
/
component.yaml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
---
documentation_complete: false
name: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.x
schema_version: 3.0.0
satisfies:
##
## BEGINNING OF:
## ACCESS CONTROL
##
## Reminder of "implementation_status" codes:
## - implementation_status: unsatisfied
## - implementation_status: unknown
## - implementation_status: planned
## - implementation_status: partial
## - implementation_status: complete
## - implementation_status: none
- control_key: AC-1
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: not applicable
narrative:
- key: a
text: |
AC-1(a) is an organizational control outside the scope of OpenShift configuration.
- key: b
text: |
AC-1(b) is an organizational control outside the scope of OpenShift configuration.
- control_key: AC-2
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: not applicable
narrative:
- key: a
text: |
AC-2(a) is an organizational control outside the scope of OpenShift configuration.
- key: b
text: |
AC-2(b) is an organizational control outside the scope of OpenShift configuration.
- key: c
text: |
AC-2(c) is an organizational control outside the scope of OpenShift configuration.
- key: d
text: |
AC-2(d) is an organizational control outside the scope of OpenShift configuration.
- key: e
text: |
AC-2(e) is an organizational control outside the scope of OpenShift configuration.
- key: f
text: |
AC-2(f) is an organizational control outside the scope of OpenShift configuration.
- key: g
text: |
AC-2(g) is an organizational control outside the scope of OpenShift configuration.
- key: h
text: |
AC-2(h) is an organizational control outside the scope of OpenShift configuration.
- key: i
text: |
AC-2(i) is an organizational control outside the scope of OpenShift configuration.
- key: j
text: |
AC-2(j) is an organizational control outside the scope of OpenShift configuration.
- key: k
text: |
AC-2(k) is an organizational control outside the scope of OpenShift configuration.
- control_key: AC-2 (1)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: complete
narrative:
- text: |-
OpenShift components of the system support automated
management through monitoring of accounts and system
activity by logging of related information.
While OpenShift can generate audit data, and securely
transport the data to a SIEM, OpenShift does not provide
automated mechanisms (e.g. email, text messages) after
system events. This functionality would fall to third
party software such as an Identity Provider (IdP),
Active Directory (MSAD), LDAP, etc.
To configure an IdP, see https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/identity_providers/configuring-ldap-identity-provider.html#configuring-ldap-identity-provider
# AC-2(2) NOTES:
# The customer will be responsible for automatically removing or
# disabling emergency and temporary accounts within the required
# timeframe. A successful control response will need to address
# all of the procedures and mechanisms involved in disabling these
# accounts.
#
- control_key: AC-2 (2)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: complete
narrative:
- text: |-
OpenShift does not have the capability to create
guest/anonymous accounts or temporary accounts. Any
external emergency or temporary accounts will be
inherited from, and managed by, an external
identity service (e.g. Active Directory, LDAP, etc.)
To configure an IdP, see https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/identity_providers/configuring-ldap-identity-provider.html#configuring-ldap-identity-provider
#
# AC-2(3) NOTES:
# The customer will be responsible for automatically disabling user
# accounts after the specified period of inactivity. A successful
# control response will need to address all automated mechanisms
# involved in disabling inactive accounts.
#
# ADMIN NOTE:
# AC-2(2) disables temp/emergency accounts after period of time.
# AC-2(3) differs by disabling *every other* account type
#
- control_key: AC-2 (3)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: complete
narrative:
- text: |-
OpenShift does not have the ability to automatically
disable user accounts. Automatic disabling of these
accounts must happen at the centralized account
management level; for example, within LDAP, Red Hat
IdM, or Active Directory.
To configure an IdP, see https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/identity_providers/configuring-ldap-identity-provider.html#configuring-ldap-identity-provider
- control_key: AC-2 (4)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |-
To meet FISMA requirements, OpenShift must be configured
to use centralized authentication (e.g. LDAP, Red Hat IdM,
Active Directory). The audit of account creation,
modification, enabling, disabling, and removal actions is
the responsibility of the centralized service. Additionally,
notification of organization-defined personnel or roles is
also the responsibility of the centralized authentication
service.
##
## Ref: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2191161
## "How to modify console session timeouts in Openshift 4"
##
- control_key: AC-2 (5)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |-
A control response for AC-2 (5) is planned. Engineering
progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-82
- control_key: AC-2 (6)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: complete
narrative:
- text: |-
OpenShift implements dynamic privilege management capabilities through the use
of a proper identity provider. OpenShift users can then be assigned roles through
role bindings.
To configure an IdP, see https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/identity_providers/configuring-ldap-identity-provider.html#configuring-ldap-identity-provider
- control_key: AC-2 (7)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: not applicable
narrative:
- key: a
text: |-
Establishing and administering privileged user accounts in accordance with a
role-based access scheme that organizes allowed information system access and
privileges into roles is an organizational control outside the scope of OpenShift
However to facilitate a control response, using Role Based Access Control (RBAC),
OpenShift roles can be used to grant various levels of access both cluster-wide as well as at
the project scope. Users and groups can be associated with, or bound
to, multiple roles at the same time.
For service accounts that might also have privileged access, Security
Context Constraints (SCC) should be used to limit privileged actions
in service accounts.
For the cluster, the kubeadmin user should be completely disabled.
More information on RBAC can be viewed at:
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/using-rbac.html
More information for SCC can be viewed at:
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/managing-security-context-constraints.html
- key: b
text: |-
The organization monitoring privileged role assignments is an organizational
control outside the configuration of OpenShift.
- key: c
text: |-
The organization taking defined actions when privileged role assignments are no
longer appropriate is an organizational control outside the scope of OpenShift.
- control_key: AC-2 (8)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: complete
narrative:
- text: |-
OpenShift will dynamically create user and system accounts in the OpenShift cluster
when configured to connect to an identity provider.
To configure an IdP, see https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/identity_providers/configuring-ldap-identity-provider.html#configuring-ldap-identity-provider
- control_key: AC-2 (9)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: not applicable
narrative:
- text: |-
This control is applicable to the identity service provider
and outside the scope of OpenShift configuration.
- control_key: AC-2 (10)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: not applicable
narrative:
- text: |-
OpenShift does not have the concept of group accounts.
Should the organization allow shared credentials, the
creation and management of such would fall under the scope
of operating the shared identity service and not OpenShift.
- control_key: AC-2 (11)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: not applicable
narrative:
- text: |-
Enforcement of organization-defined circumstances and/or usage
conditions is the responsibility of third party identity
management software such as Red Hat Identity Management (Red Hat IdM),
Active Directory (MSAD), LDAP, etc.
To configure an Identity Provider (IdP), refer to the "Authentication"
chapter of the OpenShift Container Platform documentation at
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/understanding-authentication.html
- control_key: AC-2 (12)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- key: a
text: |-
A control response for AC-2(12)(a) is planned. Engineering
progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-259
- key: b
text: |-
A control response for AC-2(12)(b) is planned. Engineering
progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-259
- control_key: AC-2 (13)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |-
A control response for AC-2(13) is planned. Engineering
progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-211
- control_key: AC-3
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: complete
narrative:
- text: |-
This control is met through the use of Role-based Access Control
for an OpenShift user. Namespaces should also be configured to
sandbox users and resources to only the required projects.
- control_key: AC-3 (1)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: not applicable
narrative:
- text: |-
This control was withdrawn by NIST, and incorporated into
AC-6
- control_key: AC-3 (2)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |-
A control response for AC-3 (2) is planned. Engineering
progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-88
- control_key: AC-3 (3)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- key: a
text: |-
A response to AC-3 (3) is planned. Engineering
progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-212
- key: b
text: |-
A response to AC-3 (3) is planned. Engineering
progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-212
- key: c
text: |-
A response to AC-3 (3) is planned. Engineering
progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-212
- control_key: AC-3 (4)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: complete
narrative:
- key: a
text: |-
OpenShift uses the concept of users and groups to segregate subjects and objects.
A user can be assigned to one or more groups, each of which represent a certain
set of users. Groups are useful when managing authorization policies to grant
permissions to multiple users at once, for example allowing access to objects
within a project, versus granting them to users individually.
OpenShift Security Context Constraints (SCC) control the actions that a pod can
perform and what it has the ability to access.
More information on Role Based Access Control (RBAC) can be viewed at:
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/using-rbac.html
More information on Security Context Constraints (SCC) can be viewed at:
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/managing-security-context-constraints.html
- key: b
text: |-
Only OpenShift cluster administrators have privileges to modify the security attributes
within OpenShift. Specifically, cluster administrators have full access to modify the
bindings of a particular role to a user. For users that have been provided more
privileges based on a particular role, those users then can only make changes based on
the privileges afforded to them.
More information on Role Based Access Control (RBAC) can be viewed at:
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/using-rbac.html
More information on Security Context Constraints (SCC) can be viewed at:
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/managing-security-context-constraints.html
- key: c
text: |-
Only OpenShift cluster administrators have privileges to modify the security attributes
within OpenShift. Specifically, cluster administrators have full access to modify the
bindings of a particular role to a user. For users that have been provided more
privileges based on a particular role, those users then can only make changes based on
the privileges afforded to them. The same is true for Security Context Constraints (SCC).
More information on Role Based Access Control (RBAC) can be viewed at:
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/using-rbac.html
More information on Security Context Constraints (SCC) can be viewed at:
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/managing-security-context-constraints.html
- key: d
text: |-
Only OpenShift cluster administrators have privileges to modify the full security attributes
within OpenShift. Specifically, cluster administrators have full access to modify the default
set of security attributes. For users that have been provided more
privileges based on a particular role, those users then can only make changes based on
the privileges afforded to them. The same is true for Security Context Constraints (SCC).
More information on Role Based Access Control (RBAC) can be viewed at:
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/using-rbac.html
More information on Security Context Constraints (SCC) can be viewed at:
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/managing-security-context-constraints.html
- key: e
text: |-
Only OpenShift cluster administrators have privileges to change rules governing access
control on the cluster. The same is true for Security Context Constraints (SCC).
More information on Role Based Access Control (RBAC) can be viewed at:
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/using-rbac.html
More information on Security Context Constraints (SCC) can be viewed at:
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/authentication/managing-security-context-constraints.html
- control_key: AC-3 (5)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A response to AC-3 (5) is planned. Progress can be tracked
via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-91
- control_key: AC-3 (6)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: not applicable
narrative:
- text: |
This control was withdrawn by NIST.
- control_key: AC-3 (7)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: complete
narrative:
- text: |-
This control is met through a variety of OpenShift technologies:
- Role-based Access Control
- Seccomp
- SELinux
- Namespaces
- Security Context Constraints (SCC)
- control_key: AC-3 (8)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |-
A response to AC-3 (8) is planned. Engineering progress can be tracked
via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-96
- control_key: AC-3 (9)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- key: a
text: |-
A response to AC-3 (9) is planned. Engineering progress can be tracked
via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-97
- key: b
text: |-
A response to AC-3 (9) is planned. Engineering progress can be tracked
via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-97
- control_key: AC-3 (10)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: complete
narrative:
- text: |-
A response to AC-3 (10) is planned. Engineering progress can be tracked
via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-213
- control_key: AC-4
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |-
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-98
- control_key: AC-4 (1)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-99
- control_key: AC-4 (2)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-100
- control_key: AC-4 (3)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-101
- control_key: AC-4 (4)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-214
- control_key: AC-4 (5)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-215
- control_key: AC-4 (6)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-102
- control_key: AC-4 (7)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-216
- control_key: AC-4 (8)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-103
- control_key: AC-4 (9)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
Changes to OpenShift information flows take effect immediately. It is assumed
that all information flow modifications have undergone organizational
approval processes prior to being implemented in OpenShift.
OpenShift cannot protect against authenticated users who were
given authorization to execute administrative commands (such as
information flow modifications).
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-104
- control_key: AC-4 (10)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: complete
narrative:
- text: |
Privileged Administrators are defined as authenticated users who
were given authorization to execute privileged commands on OpenShift
systems (e.g. "sudo access").
To modify security policies users must first authenticate with
standard credentials (e.g. username/password or username/key).
Once authenticated users must elevate privileges to root access
through usage of "sudo", which will require users to re-authenticate
themselves.
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-217
- control_key: AC-4 (11)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: complete
narrative:
- text: |
Privileged Administrators are defined as authenticated users who
were given authorization to execute privileged commands on OpenShift
systems (e.g. "sudo access").
The default system behavior allows Privileged Administrators
to (re)configure security policy filters. For example,
to reflect changes in network security policies, Privileged
Administrators can dynamically change the allowed network
ports and protocols that security policy mechanisms (such
as firewalld) check in accordance with the definitions
provided by organizations.
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-218
- control_key: AC-4 (12)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-105
- control_key: AC-4 (13)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-106
- control_key: AC-4 (14)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-107
- control_key: AC-4 (15)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-108
- control_key: AC-4 (16)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: not applicable
narrative:
- text: |
This control was withdrawn by NIST.
- control_key: AC-4 (17)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-107
- control_key: AC-4 (18)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-110
- control_key: AC-4 (19)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-111
- control_key: AC-4 (20)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-112
- control_key: AC-4 (21)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned
narrative:
- text: |-
The customer will be responsible for separating information flows
within the customer application. A successful control response will
need to address the customer organizational requirements for
the separation of information flows, and the mechanisms and
techniques used to accomplish this separation.
A control response is planned. Progress can be tracked via:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-113
- control_key: AC-4 (22)
standard_key: NIST-800-53
covered_by: []
implementation_status: planned