Description
As a staker, I want my attestations included quickly so that I make maximum reward.
beaconcha.in has implemented an Attestation Effectiveness metric based on this model. This surfaces the detailed analysis of rewards and penalties I did on Altona.
Where identifiable, Prysm and Lighthouse validators seem to be consistently in the 80-90% effective range, whereas Teku validators are consistently around 40-50%. This appears to be solely due to delays in getting attestations included, not due to missing attestations.
Example. Click Attestations to see the inclusion distance (0 distance means in the slot immediately after the block).
Acceptance Criteria
- Attestation effectiveness at least as high as Prysm and Lighthouse
Description
As a staker, I want my attestations included quickly so that I make maximum reward.
beaconcha.in has implemented an Attestation Effectiveness metric based on this model. This surfaces the detailed analysis of rewards and penalties I did on Altona.
Where identifiable, Prysm and Lighthouse validators seem to be consistently in the 80-90% effective range, whereas Teku validators are consistently around 40-50%. This appears to be solely due to delays in getting attestations included, not due to missing attestations.
Example. Click Attestations to see the inclusion distance (0 distance means in the slot immediately after the block).
Acceptance Criteria