Skip to content

Conversation

@DavePearce
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@DavePearce DavePearce linked an issue Sep 10, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Collaborator

@OlivierBBB OlivierBBB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just skimmed through the untypable lookups to determine which ones could be fixed.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢

The REL_BLOCK / BLK_NUMBER pair is the culprit.
It's fixable.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢

fixable

blockhash.macro/REL_BLOCK  :i16
hub.BLK_NUMBER             :i24

pair is the culprit.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔴

mismatch between

loginfo.DATA_SIZE                    ???
[hub.stack/STACK_ITEM_VALUE_LO 2]   :i128

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢

Fixable, MXP_WORDS is far too big

hub.misc/MXP_WORDS   :i128
mxp.macro/RES        :i32

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TBD

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 fixable

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 likely not fixable due to

trm.TRM_ADDRESS_HI      ??? // likely :i20
rlptxn.cmp/EXO_DATA_1   ??? // likely :i18

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔴 likely unfixable since STP uses the RES column for lookups into WCP and MOD

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 fixable

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.


for the +1/-1 and constant target reasons

@DavePearce DavePearce force-pushed the 747-feat-upgrade-go-corset branch from 35a273a to 97db0e6 Compare September 10, 2025 22:44
@OlivierBBB OlivierBBB self-requested a review September 10, 2025 22:54
Copy link
Collaborator

@OlivierBBB OlivierBBB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@DavePearce DavePearce merged commit c7825b7 into master Sep 10, 2025
6 checks passed
@DavePearce DavePearce deleted the 747-feat-upgrade-go-corset branch September 10, 2025 23:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat: upgrade go-corset

3 participants