Skip to content

HTTPS clone URL

Subversion checkout URL

You can clone with HTTPS or Subversion.

Download ZIP
Browse files

final

  • Loading branch information...
commit db9b64d32e7c2b99442993c7704ab3333efb5a57 1 parent fc1bad6
@michielbaird michielbaird authored
View
4 writeup/thesis_michiel/design.tex
@@ -358,8 +358,8 @@ \subsubsection{Participatory Design Session}
The focus was on what users would need regarding tasks.
The suggestion was made that all tasks be separated at site level.
Each task should have the following properties:\begin{inparaenum}[(i)]
- \item Name; \item Priority; \item Category; \item input files; \item
- status; \item description; and \item an output directory.
+ \item Name; \item Priority; \item Category; \item Input Files; \item
+ Status; \item Description; and \item an Output Directory.
\end{inparaenum}
Users should see an overview of their tasks, and on demand be able to
obtain
View
8 writeup/thesis_michiel/evaluation.tex
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ \chapter{Evaluation\label{chap3}}
The system was then tested further to see if it could perform
a subset of the tasks it would be required to perform if implemented within
-the \emph{Zamani Project}. Due to time constraints, the entire set of task required
+the \emph{Zamani Project}. Due to time constraints, the entire set of tasks required
to support the activities of the Zamani Project could not be implemented.
\section{User Experience Evaluation}
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ \subsection{Results}
The user evaluation produced a number of results. Users were on average able to
finish the task $21$ minutes, with an interquartile width of
$7$ minutes. This indicates that the users were mostly able to complete the task
-in the expected time. All but one user was able to complete the
+in the expected time. All but one of the users were able to complete the
entire set of tasks that were provided. Results of the test were acquired using two
methods: the survey; and the data from the observations.
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ \subsubsection{Build Simple Workflow\label{eval:simple}}
Users were very quickly able to determine how the system worked and how to
use it efficiently. Participants grew much more confident and decisive as
the task progressed. This is also validated by $85\%$ of the responses in
- the survey, indicated that the system was very easy learn.
+ the survey, that indicated that the system was very easy learn.
Participants did not hesitate between tasks and quickly added all the
required nodes.
\item[Satisfaction] \hfill \\
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ \subsubsection{Build Simple Workflow\label{eval:simple}}
system, this appears to have been the appropriate choice. The experiment strongly
indicated that the \emph{Job} terminology would need to be reworked. Further
observations showed that more visual cues are required to indicate that the
-tasks notes are \emph{draggable}.
+tasks nodes are \emph{draggable}.
The user study was able to highlight problems associated with the system. These
include: \begin{inparaenum}[(i)]\item Task Feedback; \item Navigation; \item
View
4 writeup/thesis_michiel/intro.tex
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ \section{Problem Statement}
to workflows similar to those found within the Zamani Project. This should allow the
system to: \begin{inparaenum}[i)] \item interface with existing systems; \item manage the
work both at a site and a user level; \item provide local data availability when users
- require it for a task; and \item increase the overall efficiency of the process
+ require it for a task; and \item increase the overall efficiency of the process.
\end{inparaenum}
\section{System Outline}
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ \section{Report Outline}
three iterations.
The final system in then evaluated in Chapter~\ref{chap3}. This was accomplished
- using a \emph{User Experience} evaluation and an \emph{Integration Case Study}
+ using a \emph{User Experience} evaluation and an \emph{Integration Case Study}.
The report is then concluded in Chapter~\ref{chap4} where the system is
reviewed. Here possible future avenues of research is discussed that could
View
7 writeup/thesis_michiel/title.tex
@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@
% Title
\HRule \\[0.4cm]
-{ \huge \bfseries Proposed Workflow System that meets the requirements of the Zamani Project}\\[0.4cm]
+{ \huge \bfseries Spacial Management of African Sites and Heritage:
+ Workflow Management System}\\[0.4cm]
\HRule \\[1.5cm]
@@ -44,7 +45,7 @@
\hline
3 & Experiment Design and Execution & 0 & 20 & 10 \\
\hline
-4 & System Development and Implementation & 0 & 15 & 10 \\
+4 & System Development and Implementation & 0 & 15 & 15 \\
\hline
5 & Results Findings and Conclusion & 10 & 20 & 10 \\
\hline
@@ -56,7 +57,7 @@
8 & Adherence to Project Proposal and Quality of Deliverables &
\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{10} & 10 \\
\hline
-9 & Overall General Project Evaluation & 0 & 10 & 5 \\
+9 & Overall General Project Evaluation & 0 & 10 & 0 \\
\hline
\multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Total}} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{80}} & \textbf{80} \\
\hline
Please sign in to comment.
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.