You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the last stakeholder meeting the question came up whether the design speeds should be supplemented by an entry none or similar, if the load cases refer e.g. to cruise flight.
It was noted that the designSpeed element is optional and could therefore simply be omitted. The suggestion seems reasonable and could be handled this way in the upcoming v3.3 release. Are there any other comments or suggestions on this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
cpacs/vehicles/aircraft/model/analyses/loadAnalysis/loadCases/flightLoadCases/flightLoadCase/loadCaseDefinition/loadCondition/designSpeed:
In the last stakeholder meeting the question came up whether the design speeds should be supplemented by an entry
none
or similar, if the load cases refer e.g. to cruise flight.It was noted that the
designSpeed
element is optional and could therefore simply be omitted. The suggestion seems reasonable and could be handled this way in the upcoming v3.3 release. Are there any other comments or suggestions on this?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: