Add Deebot T30 Pro Omni

[mimoser89]

• New Features
  Introduced a new module that enhances the Deebot hardware control system, potentially improving performance and expanding functionality.

• Tests
  Added a test case for the new model identifier "4vhygi," enhancing the robustness of the testing process.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced a new device identifier "4vhygi" to the hardware initialization tests, ensuring comprehensive coverage for all models.
  • Added a new file defining capabilities for a vacuum device, enhancing its functionalities such as cleaning, charging, and status reporting.

• Bug Fixes

  • No changes to existing test structures, maintaining the integrity of device information retrieval and capabilities validation.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A new file named p1jij8.py has been added to the deebot_client/hardware/deebot directory. This file defines a DEVICES dictionary entry for a vacuum device, encapsulating various capabilities and functionalities. Additionally, the test suite in tests/hardware/test_init.py has been updated to include a new device identifier "4vhygi" in the test_all_models_loaded function. The existing test functions remain unchanged in structure and continue to validate their respective functionalities.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/p1jij8.py	New file added, defining capabilities for a vacuum device.
tests/hardware/test_init.py	Added device identifier "4vhygi" to test_all_models_loaded; no changes to other test functions.

Possibly related PRs

• Add Deebot T30 Omni #548: The addition of the new file p1jij8.py in the main PR is directly related to the introduction of a new module in the deebot_client/hardware/deebot directory.

Suggested labels

pr: new-feature

Poem

In the deebot's den, a new file does gleam,
p1jij8.py, like a bright little dream.
With tests now updated, a device joins the fray,
A hop and a skip, let’s code and play! 🐇✨
New features abound, let’s cheer and rejoice,
For every new line, we’ll give it a voice!

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 57b1dfc and b073345.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• deebot_client/hardware/deebot/4vhygi.py (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• deebot_client/hardware/deebot/4vhygi.py

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bfd7147 and bba813e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• deebot_client/hardware/deebot/4vhygi.py (1 hunks)
• tests/hardware/test_init.py (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 Ruff

deebot_client/hardware/deebot/4vhygi.py

1-1: No such file or directory (os error 2)

(E902)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

tests/hardware/test_init.py (1)

287-287: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add test coverage for the new model's capabilities

The new model "4vhygi" (T30 Pro Omni) has been added to test_all_models_loaded, but there's no corresponding test case in test_capabilities_event_extraction to verify its specific capabilities and commands.

Please add a test case to ensure the new model's capabilities are properly tested, similar to other models like "p95mgv" which includes various events and commands specific to that model.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 21e447b and 8d3384f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• deebot_client/hardware/deebot/4vhygi.py (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 Ruff

deebot_client/hardware/deebot/4vhygi.py

1-1: No such file or directory (os error 2)

(E902)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

deebot_client/hardware/deebot/4vhygi.py (1)

1-1: Verify file naming convention

The filename "4vhygi.py" seems to be a model identifier, but the file content mentions "p1jij8.py". This inconsistency needs to be resolved.

🧰 Tools

🪛 Ruff

1-1: No such file or directory (os error 2)

(E902)

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8d3384f and 57b1dfc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• deebot_client/hardware/deebot/4vhygi.py (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 Ruff

deebot_client/hardware/deebot/4vhygi.py

1-1: No such file or directory (os error 2)

(E902)

[edenhaus]

Thanks @mimoser89 👍

Fixed the symlink for you :)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.67%. Comparing base (bfd7147) to head (b073345).
Report is 5 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #597   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.67%   86.67%           
=======================================
  Files          89       89           
  Lines        3324     3324           
  Branches      297      297           
=======================================
  Hits         2881     2881           
  Misses        389      389           
  Partials       54       54           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests
• JS Bundle Analysis - Avoid shipping oversized bundles