diff --git a/Concepts.md b/Concepts.md index 2dd1fa2..fdcfc9a 100644 --- a/Concepts.md +++ b/Concepts.md @@ -1,3 +1,103 @@ # Concepts This is a collection of concepts that are necessary for following & contributing to discussions within the open memetics commuity. It's a community curated shared language that tries to balance onboarding newcomers with expressing the necessary complexity at the frontier. + + +there are a few basic components that make up the relationships in an environment and i wrote up a small hopefully usable and buildable definition that we can start with to explain some other virtualist concepts: + + +Agents + +Agents act according to their desires and along a pre-predictive (not pre-determined) path. + + +Agents receive inputs, they process the information through their existing knowledge and experiences, and they compose an output for the world + + + + +The Environment +-The environment refers to the space where agents are contained. + + +In most contexts, it will refer to specific websites, locations, or “the internet” as a whole. + + +Environments can be modified in various ways + + + + +In an environment, agents produce signals. + +they do this (generally) in response to a different signal, or as a way to express some internal need. + + + + +Not all agents are authentic. + + +While many agents are genuine and truthseeking, some are either intentionally malevolent, uninformed, or a bot. + + +In these cases, we can use a few different terms for the ways signals are perceived + + +For now, lets keep it simple with “signaling that is true”, or “signaling that is false” (for whatever reason) + +these concepts allow us to learn more later, about infowar and information engagements + + + + + + + +When considering agents in the environment from an outside perspective, we need to also keep in perspective the subjective experiences of the agent. + + +For example, there will be times where the agent is presenting a truth that is a truth for them, but is a false in the “universal” sense of information. + + + + + +With many agents in an environment, there is cross contamination of signals, and dissonance between signals. + + +This can be thought of as a kind of “epistemic overload”, where it is unknown what is true and what is false. + + +This generates what Defender calls epistemic noise. Many agents are overwhelmed and unable to process enough information, even with advanced tactics. + +Many would say that this is a disaster. Having bots, malicious agents, tricksters, and more taking up the internet away from all the kind hearted truthers out there IN ADDITION to all the good kind hearted truthers. + + +Through this overload of information, agents can develop a sense for wading through epistemic noise. Codex called this “using nyquist theorem”, combining bits and pieces from multiple sources and comparing them to determine “real” information. + + +Familiarity with certain patterns of information can help form and craft the understanding space of an agent + + + + +Understanding space + +The understanding space is the information space that an agent contains. + + +In this paper https://vec2vec.github.io Harnessing the Universal Geometry of Embeddings + +the idea that is explored, is that all models share a universal “platonic representation space”. + + +This is the universal understanding space. It contains “information gathered” from all agents within, because it’s a superset that contains everything. + + + +Each agent inside of this superset has their own coordinates within “information embedding space”. They have their own understanding space that interacts with information in its own unique way. + + +This influences the way that incoming information, incoming entropy, interacts with their agent and the predicted response of the agent +