Skip to content

Equal ratio allocation objective take 2#1386

Merged
SouthEndMusic merged 32 commits into
mainfrom
equal_ratio_allocation_objective
May 23, 2024
Merged

Equal ratio allocation objective take 2#1386
SouthEndMusic merged 32 commits into
mainfrom
equal_ratio_allocation_objective

Conversation

@SouthEndMusic
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Merge equal_allocation_objective again after #1385, after fixing #1383.

@SouthEndMusic SouthEndMusic changed the title Equal ratio allocation objective Equal ratio allocation objective take 2 Apr 15, 2024
@SouthEndMusic SouthEndMusic marked this pull request as draft April 15, 2024 09:37
@SouthEndMusic SouthEndMusic marked this pull request as ready for review April 22, 2024 16:31
@SouthEndMusic SouthEndMusic requested a review from visr April 22, 2024 16:37
Comment thread core/src/allocation_init.jl Outdated
@SouthEndMusic
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

SouthEndMusic commented Apr 23, 2024

The FlowBoundary node was not marked as flow direction constraining, which lead to unconstrained allocation flow into FlowBoundary nodes in several models. Hopefully this brings us back to deterministic behavior, at least where it matters.

@SouthEndMusic SouthEndMusic requested a review from visr April 23, 2024 12:21
@SouthEndMusic SouthEndMusic marked this pull request as draft April 24, 2024 10:38
@SouthEndMusic SouthEndMusic marked this pull request as ready for review May 23, 2024 09:32
Comment thread python/ribasim_testmodels/ribasim_testmodels/allocation.py
@SouthEndMusic SouthEndMusic merged commit 1386ced into main May 23, 2024
@SouthEndMusic SouthEndMusic deleted the equal_ratio_allocation_objective branch May 23, 2024 12:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants