Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Roadmap: Improve Waiting Mechanism for Assertions #5967

Closed
DIRECTcut opened this issue Feb 17, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Roadmap: Improve Waiting Mechanism for Assertions #5967

DIRECTcut opened this issue Feb 17, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
FREQUENCY: level 2 TYPE: enhancement The accepted proposal for future implementation.

Comments

@DIRECTcut
Copy link
Contributor

TestCafe's built-in waiting mechanism is designed to eliminate the need for manual timeouts during assertions.

It's planned to rethink this mechanism, especially concerning exists and visible assertions. Such improvement would increase test stability for most users.

@DIRECTcut DIRECTcut added the TYPE: enhancement The accepted proposal for future implementation. label Feb 17, 2021
@DIRECTcut DIRECTcut changed the title Improve Waiting Mechanism for Assertions Roadmap: Improve Waiting Mechanism for Assertions Feb 17, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity for a long period. It will be closed and archived if no further activity occurs. However, we may return to this issue in the future. If it still affects you or you have any additional information regarding it, please leave a comment and we will keep it open.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the STATE: Stale An outdated issue that will be automatically closed by the Stale bot. label Feb 18, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

We're closing this issue after a prolonged period of inactivity. If it still affects you, please add a comment to this issue with up-to-date information. Thank you.

@helen-dikareva helen-dikareva added FREQUENCY: level 2 and removed STATE: Stale An outdated issue that will be automatically closed by the Stale bot. labels Apr 15, 2022
@helen-dikareva
Copy link
Collaborator

Take into account #1191

@miherlosev
Copy link
Collaborator

Closed in favor #1191

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
FREQUENCY: level 2 TYPE: enhancement The accepted proposal for future implementation.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants