New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A verification only with CovPassCheck is no longer possible due to the new 2G+ rules in some federal states #73
Comments
|
It's the same for the Android app: Digitaler-Impfnachweis/covpass-android#128 |
|
Yes, that's why I added the hint "This issue applies to iOS and Android" to the OP of the issue. |
|
The basic problem of this issue caused me to open an enhancement request to implement serial scanning of certificates for CovPassCheck: Digitaler-Impfnachweis/covpass-android#107 |
|
Not only the CovPassCheck app does not show the info about the booster, but also the label above the QR Code in the CovPass App is missleading: It says "Vollständig seit: XXX" although this is the date of the Booster. I know this is an android screenshot but I thought it's better to post it here because the android issue only references to this issue. |
|
I reported this bug a while ago in Digitaler-Impfnachweis/covpass-android#94. |
|
Some German states introducing the "2Gplus"-rule start to add the mitigation that the additional test is not only not-required after a "Booster", but also when the last vaccination of a complete series is not longer than 6 month ago. Example from today: https://www.baden-wuerttemberg.de/de/service/presse/pressemitteilung/pid/ausnahmen-von-der-testpflicht-bei-2g-plus-1/ With this, the current architecture of CovPassCheck can be saved by printing the date of vaccination of the scanned certificate, or, as for tests, the number of days/months since then, or if the 6 months manifest as standard a data saving "< / > 6 month indicator". A general "solution" to the German rule mess is IMHO only possible by an approach like with the Austrian "GreenCheck" app, which implements multiple rules and the checker has to select which rule-set shall be checked against. Some of those rules then even ask refined for the concrete state (here e.g. "Wien or not Wien"). Advantage of this is that the check person can still rely on "Green / Red" and does not need to think about the rules. |
|
There are also multiple requests on Twitter to show if the certificate is a booster shot in the Check app. With the new legislation as described by @Ein-Tim I would consider this high priority. https://twitter.com/ti_twr/status/1467168138672418831 |
|
Hey everyone, first off - thank you for the discussion! As you all noticed the new 2G+ and 2G+B regulations are highly dynamic and can differ from state to state. We are also aware that our current data-privacy restrictions (which are surely important) further complicate the check possibilities. We are working on an improvement for 3G / 2G / 2G+ and 2G+B venues/ locations for every state. For now I would kindly ask you to bear with us 🐻 We will keep you updated! 🚧 |
|
The "GreenCheck" app of Austria yesterday published an update which now also supports the "2G+" mode. It then scans two certificates (vaccination/test) sequentially and you get an intermediary result as well as a final result. Could act as blueprint. |
|
The #covpass generated EU Digital COVID Certificate is such an easy to manipulate pdf file. Just overwrite the number of vaccinations and change the date of vaccination to present date. With this sheet of paper you will get entrance to all 2G+ locations that accept 2G+B. The QR code is shown as valid by #covpasscheck |
|
@Free-Beast I had to read you comment again but now I understand your concern towards verifying booster shots. In any case, I agree that the Check app desperately needs a redesign for this (new) use case. |
|
Hi everybody here. I used the search function and I read some postings, but could exactly find what I heard. If that's true, the problem would be: The recommendation for booster vaccination is ca. 6 months (5 months are also ok) after the first complete vaccination. Now the certificates are becoming invalid after 6 months by law. That unnecessary 14 day delay would cut the time window of one month for the booster vaccination down to 14 days where to have at least one valid certificate without any interruption. Thank you in advance to everybody who checks that issue and writes here if he can confirm it or not. |
Please, could you provide a link to this law? To answer your question: 3/3 certificate are immediately valid & don't have a 14 days waiting period. |
Thank you for your answer. Now I found out that I may misunderstood something.
Short translation: If things are really worse, your certificate must be max. 6 months old. I understood in the media that "your certificate must be max. 6 months old" is for all situations respecively I mixed it up with discussions to generally time-limit the certificate. So I think the discussion here before my posting is already leading in the right direction concerning that booster (e.g. 3rd) certificate. But I will try out my booster certificate together with that software as soon as I'm booster vaccined to check if it really works as it should ;-) |
The reason for the inability to identify J&J and Recovery Boosters is due to an unfortunate decision in the EU to reject the suggestion of member states like Germany to keep the number of doses required for initial immunity and simply increase the number of shots given. Marcus |
|
Transferring the comment Digitaler-Impfnachweis/covpass-android#139 (comment) from @oliver-steinbrecher here:
|
Can anybody tell when 1.17 will be there? Current release is 1.13 which was released in November (almost 7 weeks ago). EDIT: obviously this was already discussed in the android issue and requested to be implemented within a shorter time: Digitaler-Impfnachweis/covpass-android#139 (comment) |
|
We apologize for this delay. Hopefully 1.15 is available beginning of next week. Watch out :) |
|
In Digitaler-Impfnachweis/covpass-android#139 (comment) you said this will come with 1.17. Was this feature moved to 1.15? |
|
Sorry for my misleading message. 1.17 will be lunched beginning of February. There have been some delay with the other releases 1.15 and 1.16 . 1.15 will be available hopefully next week |
|
@oliver-steinbrecher Okay, thanks for the info, but version 1.15 won't solve this issue, correct? |
|
With version 1.17 which was released today, 2G+ scenarios can now be checked. However, CovPassCheck does not take boosters into account. I will leave this issue open until version 1.18, which takes boosters into account, is released. |
|
1.18 is going to be Released in roughly two weeks. Development is done and QA phase is running. |
|
What will be your approach reg. the different rules in the federal states (e.g. booster is only allowed to be 90 days old, etc.)? |
|
We’re going to leverage different business rules. Planned are currently rules on EU and domestic level. Those will be available in 1.18 |
|
So there will be some kind of menu where the controlling person can select the EU country and the federal state? |
|
States are lifting their 2G+ restrictions and CovPassCheck can fully be used to check 2G+ scenarios. Closing as fixed. |


This issue applies to iOS and Android
Avoid duplicates
Technical details
Describe the bug
The CovPass-App currently states:

However, this is not a good advice for people which received the booster, lifing in Baden- Württemberg, Lower Saxony or Rhineland-Palatine and want to attend a 2G+ event. By law, they are not required to get tested before (because they have received the booster shot). So now, they just go to an event and have all their certificates stored in CovPass.
The personal checking the certificates is using CovPassCheck to verify the certificates, however, there is no other way for the person attending the event to proof their booster but scrolling down in CovPass and showing the "3/3" certificate, as CovPassCheck does not differentiate between a normal vaccination certificate and the one from a booster.
Steps to reproduce the issue
Expected behaviour
Not too sure, see "Possible Fix" below.
Possible Fix
CovPassCheck shows more details, e.g. which certificate (2/2, 3/3, etc.) certificate was presented (But this is still not "the" best solution as 2/2 can also stand for a booster).
Edit: The "Saarland" seems to handle it like described above too: https://www.saarbruecker-zeitung.de/app/consent/?ref=https://www.saarbruecker-zeitung.de/saarland/landespolitik/2g-plus-regel-im-saarland-tobias-hans-kuendigt-erleichterung-an_aid-64437555. Edit 2: Bayern too: https://twitter.com/Markus_Soeder/status/1470749609228132355?s=20
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: