Remove closet sexism #20

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into
from

Projects

None yet
@seutje

Same joke, less sexist.

@minecrawler
minecrawler commented Jul 29, 2016 edited

I think, that term was part of the joke. It's an established phrase. I do not think of it as being sexist.
It's a shame all this gender rage lately tries to neutralize everything to one big pile of grey sameness.

Really now, it's just a joke!

@LinAGKar

Real programmers is also an established phrase https://xkcd.com/378/. Honestly, while I don't care much for the PC culture, I think this fits better. Not all real men are real programmers.

@pshendry

@minecrawler: "Real Xs never Y" is a saying of its own; it doesn't need to be "men" in order to make sense. There's also nothing in the joke that plays on male bravado, so it arguably makes more sense as "programmers". It seems a little insensitive honestly to be complaining about political correctness gone too far over someone wanting to eliminate a clear "programmers = men" implication by changing a single word. It's bikeshedding even having a conversation about it IMO.

@binary132

Real men never merge these kinds of pull requests.

@brycedrennan
brycedrennan commented Jul 29, 2016 edited

This whole piece is a satire. If there is sexism in it, then I'd read that as part of the satire.

I read this little bit of "sexism" as making fun of the male bravado stereotype.

@Alir3z4

I don't think any pull request that tries to change sentences or any such should be accepted.
If there's a typo or Markdown syntax then yeah.

Real men never merge these kinds of pull requests.

@Nakilon

This pull request is a sexism.

@caseyfw

I agree that this should be merged - 'real programmers' makes far more sense in this context than 'real men', despite the fact that the latter is indeed an existing, albeit unnecessarily gender-charged expression.

@cajhne

Real programmers ftw. Some of the comments here need pull requests of their own. Real men often aren't.

@Droogans
Owner

Thanks for your suggestion, @seutje. Although many commenters here have made good points about this suggested update, it does not fit the intention of this project.

See #19 for details. Please limit all contributions to grammar fixes, punctuation errors, typos, and other non-semantic changes to the style or writing in any way.

@Droogans Droogans closed this Aug 1, 2016
@seutje seutje deleted the seutje:seutje-patch-1 branch Aug 2, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment