diff --git a/.DS_Store b/.DS_Store
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..604f98c
Binary files /dev/null and b/.DS_Store differ
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e43b0f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+.DS_Store
diff --git a/Ricardian_contract_explained.md b/Ricardian_contract_explained.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a975207
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Ricardian_contract_explained.md
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+# What did Ricardian Contract say?
+
+
+
+We has translated the content of the Ricardian Contract before, many readers said that the length is too long and difficult to understand. I try to make full use of concise words summed up to sort out a text version of the chart, along with personal understanding the explanation of the content, I hope this article can help you understand more about the content of the Ricardian Contract in a certain Angle.
+![李嘉图合约英-1.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUKWU9STTKoMPLisyPjNQcrEAN16shTZ1JHUWQTFVnM8E/%E6%9D%8E%E5%98%89%E5%9B%BE%E5%90%88%E7%BA%A6%E8%8B%B1-1.jpeg)
+
+As can be seen from FIG. 1, in fact, the whole Ricardian Contract tries to express the concept of *The contract is the issue*. And in this paper, the following content, we can see all of the *financial instruments*, is the issue of generation refers to all the price equivalent, such as currencies, shares, loyalty systems ,vouchers and other financial derivatives. Its value is recognized by some people and is willing to use it as a tool to trade equivalents.
+
+So, why do we see the Ricardian Contract?
+
+Because the original payment system in the financial instruments, has not kept pace with the needs of The Times. And it's important to note that every financial instrument, it's best to think of the relationship as a contract between the issuer and the holder. Such as the central bank issued by RMB, we would be willing to pay accept RMB, willing to take it as a tool for buying and selling of transactions, the value of these holders because we believe the behind and powerful government credit.
+
+Or use another Angle to explain, because everyone around him to believe and accept, based on this agreement, as one of them, had to try to believe so self-evident invisible contract during a words:
+
+> "Trust me, and I'll give you the exchange of value."
+
+Once you are a holder, you acknowledge that there is a contractual relationship between you and the issuer.
+![李嘉图合约英-2.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdfN1SoeDYXeghkFWL2ueaiebYjMb6xUzPGzxip7PAnCR/%E6%9D%8E%E5%98%89%E5%9B%BE%E5%90%88%E7%BA%A6%E8%8B%B1-2.jpeg)
+
+In our lives, the transactions we see, you can almost write it as an equation:* the transaction = transfer + payment system*. By issuing different instructions, the payment system receives, executes, and then transfers money. One common feature of these instructions is that they all recognize the financial system. So the question here is -- how do these financial systems find a better way to capture, identify, and describe?
+
+The latter part of the process is probably more mature, whereas the former *Instruction* recognition part is more likely to generate ambiguity. Because in our ordinary people's cognitive, we believe that the dollar, gold, and the value behind the support, who can break the human belief in precious metals thousands of years？However, this is far from enough, the issue of other financial instruments, what you believe in it the value behind the support?
+
+After all we are in a era of rapid economic development, the financial world is full of hot money and expectation, capitalists and politicians, and its derivative financial instruments has to be used to create more powerful and imaginative world. We know that *Gold =AUG*, *Digital Gold Currency =DGC*, when someone wants to continue issuing financial instruments based on gold, it is likely that there will be a *bump the same shirt*.
+
+So ,
+
+> Who is who?
+
+> How do you tell the difference?
+
+> How professional do you have to be?
+
+> How can you guarantee the level of trust behind you?
+
+These all are problems.
+![李嘉图合约英-3.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmVdvbu2F9CEEjTp9oieQn4fFR3e3gQh9WGQmWMn75NQYf/%E6%9D%8E%E5%98%89%E5%9B%BE%E5%90%88%E7%BA%A6%E8%8B%B1-3.jpeg)
+
+These problems have been tried in real financial markets. Such as Mark Twain Bank of the USA issued valuable currency was identified with the number 4, the digital cash plan eCash is each country according to the international dialing code column into a set of Numbers, as Germany is 49, Australia is 61.
+
+Later, finding it insufficient, try to simplify the entire system with tuple (issuer, type, identifier). For example, Joint Universal and Nationwide Keiretsu issued zero coupon bonds in January 2100, forming a tuple of (JUNK, 0, Jan_2100).
+
+However, such infinite growth is clearly not an effective solution for long-term development, and Numbers are prone to ambiguity. Can't you describe the entire tool in a simpler, more convenient way?
+
+So first of all, we need to know:
+
+> What's the whole thing;
+
+> How to describe it;
+
+> And are the above descriptions true and believable?
+
+The Ricardian Contract attempts to use *Zero Coupon Bond* as a benchmark for design, the smallest unit. We can try to imagine this as a tree-structured tuple database, a minimal unit that applies only to a single financial instrument, or small and easily replaceable financial instrument.
+![李嘉图合约英-4.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdYdnV1UudU6ep9ZXCXgojxdHCm3n8CYfPXxi1FoUBidM/%E6%9D%8E%E5%98%89%E5%9B%BE%E5%90%88%E7%BA%A6%E8%8B%B1-4.jpeg)
+As we said above, there is a high consensus on the value of dollars and gold. Yet the cost of publishing digital dollars is also high for institutions like the federal reserve, which has never declared bankruptcy without a credit crisis. Because in general, derivatives need to do the pledge with the same amount or a percentage of the deposit, such as I want to release the number of units 1 dollar, declared that I use the same unit of dollar to pledge, I will issue the financial derivatives, it is one of them.
+
+The other need to think about is risk. The fed just didn't have a credit stain before, but what about the future, or is it doing some secretly operation that we can't see?
+
+In the same amount of stable cash, financial derivatives are abundant. Is cash enough?
+
+Here again, the phrase *Every different issuing currency is a clear contract between the issuer and the holder* is stressed. Imagine that almost all of these derivatives need to be based on cash reserves, or gold reserves. What if there is no such high consensus as the dollar or gold?
+
+This is exactly the same as the above problem of trying to extend with tuples and bytes. What is the problem we need to solve?
+
+Capture, describe, identify. The two are then correlated and executed.
+
+It from a certain perspective, actually in the middle of this contract is a bit like a matchmaker, matchmaker worth his salt can accurately capture and describe the condition of the woman, she identified a type which is suitable for men, and then use professional competent ability, information matching set related men, men and women both parties to identify consistent, execute the next *Deal*.
+![李嘉图合约英-5.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaLrqodSZmpRNZPqAz3beH6deVe6ivb9Y9c4N5A4YtFrd/%E6%9D%8E%E5%98%89%E5%9B%BE%E5%90%88%E7%BA%A6%E8%8B%B1-5.jpeg)
+
+![李嘉图合约英-6.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNe3mCckVePDyQwsRHDBUfeStaB9qwqD4YwiQDuq1ykJm/%E6%9D%8E%E5%98%89%E5%9B%BE%E5%90%88%E7%BA%A6%E8%8B%B1-6.jpeg)
+
+If you accept the concept of *Issue = Contract*, you will understand more than half of the whole article. If you don't accept it, I'm afraid the following will be more difficult for you to understand. The bottom line is based on this concept, and the core of what needs to be done is to create a contract that connects to the payment system.
+
+Let's define the Ricardian Contract as a document, the meaning of which can be seen in the 7 extended content. Simply put, it's a file that supports one of the values that's being released over the Internet. Think about what we said above, what could we do to benchmark derivatives without the support of high consensus value equivalents like the dollar and gold?
+
+My understanding is that this is a strict and free document. It has certain precise and insurmountable principles as the precondition, which must be followed, and at the same time, it has a high tolerance for different value systems and accepts derivatives of different benchmarks.
+
+We used to worry about centralizing institutions because they had too much power, privately modifying contracts or even unilaterally tearing them up. There was no framework to limit it. The Ricardian Contract USES hash to protect the weaker party from such unfair treatment and there is no solution. Because the hash is untamable, the hash value exists as a record in the contract. Whenever there is any modification, a new hash value will be created.
+
+The definition of the public key structure also increased the contract information, a trusted third party need to use the certificate issued to prove that the issuer of the key, the process through the entire network traces the person information is verified. In general, the relationship is that this key (the top secret key of an individual signing a contract) signs another secret key (signing a contract). This sentence is rather convoluted, read it several times before you can understand it. That is, to sign a contract with the highest authority, the signature needs to ensure the identity of the individual and the security of the entire document.
+![李嘉图合约英-7.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNpA59y7Kqbint9fFxohAgJMSnHcvqpYSo7mDYTAKYLuy/%E6%9D%8E%E5%98%89%E5%9B%BE%E5%90%88%E7%BA%A6%E8%8B%B1-7.jpeg)
+
+So，the Ricardian Contract wants to build is a readable document with verifiable digital signatures and unfalsifiable identifiers linked to each record. Each of the above attributes has an important meaning:
+
+> Determine what each file describes;
+
+> Whether the description is accurate;
+
+> And whether the precise description was actually agreed by the signatories;
+
+> How to ensure that the consent of the parties is indeed signed by the parties;
+
+> ......
+
+We are on guard against the need for future partial judicial decisions that require too much effort to define unclear content and not necessarily fair outcomes. The document set out above is detailed and accurate enough to be followed by evidence that it will take a lot of effort to argue if there is a real dispute. There is only one line in someone's heart:
+
+> Clearly defined in the front, want to argue? No way!
+
+Finally came the conclusion. Remember that the contract is the keystone of issuance. The innovation of the Ricardian Contract is that it is clear, untampered, unforgeabled and verifiable with the digital contract, so as to reduce disputes.
+
+As you know, how high is the cost of dispute ! And all this happened, because everyone who participated in the execution have different values, the understanding of the same thing, will have different meanings for different people. Probably the result of Lucy thinks it only be X, but Tom think is not only Y, but Z. When the cognitive and in the contract before and made no mention of the matter, assume their respective contents appear in the results will be split when disappointed. Describe a contract with a digital contract, linking each possible operation to minimize non-consensus.
+
+So there's a lot of room for this ideal model to hit a wall. For example, *Every Associated Operation*, where you can continue to imagine the future within experience, but what about the beyond experience? This requires a higher-order model to simulate ahead of time.
+
+The details of the build before the operation are too numerous to be imagined and fully covered, but it is certainly a leapfrogging structural proposal. Importantly, the contract proposal has become the consensus of a group of people who are building the world of ideas for the future.
+
+In conclusion, what did the Ricardian Contract say?
+
+Think of each issue as a contract, and the Ricardian Contract forms the basis for understanding the issue and each transaction in the issue.
+
+I hope this article will help you understand a little bit more about the Ricardian Contract. The interpretation may be biased. This article first language is Chinese, and the link is <https://steemit.com/eos/@eoshenzhen/6ipbwb> 《李嘉图合约究竟讲了什么》
+
+Conference :
+*The Ricardian Contract, Ian Grigg*
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/What did Ricardian Contract say.md b/What did Ricardian Contract say.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a975207
--- /dev/null
+++ b/What did Ricardian Contract say.md	
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+# What did Ricardian Contract say?
+
+
+
+We has translated the content of the Ricardian Contract before, many readers said that the length is too long and difficult to understand. I try to make full use of concise words summed up to sort out a text version of the chart, along with personal understanding the explanation of the content, I hope this article can help you understand more about the content of the Ricardian Contract in a certain Angle.
+![李嘉图合约英-1.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUKWU9STTKoMPLisyPjNQcrEAN16shTZ1JHUWQTFVnM8E/%E6%9D%8E%E5%98%89%E5%9B%BE%E5%90%88%E7%BA%A6%E8%8B%B1-1.jpeg)
+
+As can be seen from FIG. 1, in fact, the whole Ricardian Contract tries to express the concept of *The contract is the issue*. And in this paper, the following content, we can see all of the *financial instruments*, is the issue of generation refers to all the price equivalent, such as currencies, shares, loyalty systems ,vouchers and other financial derivatives. Its value is recognized by some people and is willing to use it as a tool to trade equivalents.
+
+So, why do we see the Ricardian Contract?
+
+Because the original payment system in the financial instruments, has not kept pace with the needs of The Times. And it's important to note that every financial instrument, it's best to think of the relationship as a contract between the issuer and the holder. Such as the central bank issued by RMB, we would be willing to pay accept RMB, willing to take it as a tool for buying and selling of transactions, the value of these holders because we believe the behind and powerful government credit.
+
+Or use another Angle to explain, because everyone around him to believe and accept, based on this agreement, as one of them, had to try to believe so self-evident invisible contract during a words:
+
+> "Trust me, and I'll give you the exchange of value."
+
+Once you are a holder, you acknowledge that there is a contractual relationship between you and the issuer.
+![李嘉图合约英-2.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdfN1SoeDYXeghkFWL2ueaiebYjMb6xUzPGzxip7PAnCR/%E6%9D%8E%E5%98%89%E5%9B%BE%E5%90%88%E7%BA%A6%E8%8B%B1-2.jpeg)
+
+In our lives, the transactions we see, you can almost write it as an equation:* the transaction = transfer + payment system*. By issuing different instructions, the payment system receives, executes, and then transfers money. One common feature of these instructions is that they all recognize the financial system. So the question here is -- how do these financial systems find a better way to capture, identify, and describe?
+
+The latter part of the process is probably more mature, whereas the former *Instruction* recognition part is more likely to generate ambiguity. Because in our ordinary people's cognitive, we believe that the dollar, gold, and the value behind the support, who can break the human belief in precious metals thousands of years？However, this is far from enough, the issue of other financial instruments, what you believe in it the value behind the support?
+
+After all we are in a era of rapid economic development, the financial world is full of hot money and expectation, capitalists and politicians, and its derivative financial instruments has to be used to create more powerful and imaginative world. We know that *Gold =AUG*, *Digital Gold Currency =DGC*, when someone wants to continue issuing financial instruments based on gold, it is likely that there will be a *bump the same shirt*.
+
+So ,
+
+> Who is who?
+
+> How do you tell the difference?
+
+> How professional do you have to be?
+
+> How can you guarantee the level of trust behind you?
+
+These all are problems.
+![李嘉图合约英-3.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmVdvbu2F9CEEjTp9oieQn4fFR3e3gQh9WGQmWMn75NQYf/%E6%9D%8E%E5%98%89%E5%9B%BE%E5%90%88%E7%BA%A6%E8%8B%B1-3.jpeg)
+
+These problems have been tried in real financial markets. Such as Mark Twain Bank of the USA issued valuable currency was identified with the number 4, the digital cash plan eCash is each country according to the international dialing code column into a set of Numbers, as Germany is 49, Australia is 61.
+
+Later, finding it insufficient, try to simplify the entire system with tuple (issuer, type, identifier). For example, Joint Universal and Nationwide Keiretsu issued zero coupon bonds in January 2100, forming a tuple of (JUNK, 0, Jan_2100).
+
+However, such infinite growth is clearly not an effective solution for long-term development, and Numbers are prone to ambiguity. Can't you describe the entire tool in a simpler, more convenient way?
+
+So first of all, we need to know:
+
+> What's the whole thing;
+
+> How to describe it;
+
+> And are the above descriptions true and believable?
+
+The Ricardian Contract attempts to use *Zero Coupon Bond* as a benchmark for design, the smallest unit. We can try to imagine this as a tree-structured tuple database, a minimal unit that applies only to a single financial instrument, or small and easily replaceable financial instrument.
+![李嘉图合约英-4.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdYdnV1UudU6ep9ZXCXgojxdHCm3n8CYfPXxi1FoUBidM/%E6%9D%8E%E5%98%89%E5%9B%BE%E5%90%88%E7%BA%A6%E8%8B%B1-4.jpeg)
+As we said above, there is a high consensus on the value of dollars and gold. Yet the cost of publishing digital dollars is also high for institutions like the federal reserve, which has never declared bankruptcy without a credit crisis. Because in general, derivatives need to do the pledge with the same amount or a percentage of the deposit, such as I want to release the number of units 1 dollar, declared that I use the same unit of dollar to pledge, I will issue the financial derivatives, it is one of them.
+
+The other need to think about is risk. The fed just didn't have a credit stain before, but what about the future, or is it doing some secretly operation that we can't see?
+
+In the same amount of stable cash, financial derivatives are abundant. Is cash enough?
+
+Here again, the phrase *Every different issuing currency is a clear contract between the issuer and the holder* is stressed. Imagine that almost all of these derivatives need to be based on cash reserves, or gold reserves. What if there is no such high consensus as the dollar or gold?
+
+This is exactly the same as the above problem of trying to extend with tuples and bytes. What is the problem we need to solve?
+
+Capture, describe, identify. The two are then correlated and executed.
+
+It from a certain perspective, actually in the middle of this contract is a bit like a matchmaker, matchmaker worth his salt can accurately capture and describe the condition of the woman, she identified a type which is suitable for men, and then use professional competent ability, information matching set related men, men and women both parties to identify consistent, execute the next *Deal*.
+![李嘉图合约英-5.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaLrqodSZmpRNZPqAz3beH6deVe6ivb9Y9c4N5A4YtFrd/%E6%9D%8E%E5%98%89%E5%9B%BE%E5%90%88%E7%BA%A6%E8%8B%B1-5.jpeg)
+
+![李嘉图合约英-6.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNe3mCckVePDyQwsRHDBUfeStaB9qwqD4YwiQDuq1ykJm/%E6%9D%8E%E5%98%89%E5%9B%BE%E5%90%88%E7%BA%A6%E8%8B%B1-6.jpeg)
+
+If you accept the concept of *Issue = Contract*, you will understand more than half of the whole article. If you don't accept it, I'm afraid the following will be more difficult for you to understand. The bottom line is based on this concept, and the core of what needs to be done is to create a contract that connects to the payment system.
+
+Let's define the Ricardian Contract as a document, the meaning of which can be seen in the 7 extended content. Simply put, it's a file that supports one of the values that's being released over the Internet. Think about what we said above, what could we do to benchmark derivatives without the support of high consensus value equivalents like the dollar and gold?
+
+My understanding is that this is a strict and free document. It has certain precise and insurmountable principles as the precondition, which must be followed, and at the same time, it has a high tolerance for different value systems and accepts derivatives of different benchmarks.
+
+We used to worry about centralizing institutions because they had too much power, privately modifying contracts or even unilaterally tearing them up. There was no framework to limit it. The Ricardian Contract USES hash to protect the weaker party from such unfair treatment and there is no solution. Because the hash is untamable, the hash value exists as a record in the contract. Whenever there is any modification, a new hash value will be created.
+
+The definition of the public key structure also increased the contract information, a trusted third party need to use the certificate issued to prove that the issuer of the key, the process through the entire network traces the person information is verified. In general, the relationship is that this key (the top secret key of an individual signing a contract) signs another secret key (signing a contract). This sentence is rather convoluted, read it several times before you can understand it. That is, to sign a contract with the highest authority, the signature needs to ensure the identity of the individual and the security of the entire document.
+![李嘉图合约英-7.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNpA59y7Kqbint9fFxohAgJMSnHcvqpYSo7mDYTAKYLuy/%E6%9D%8E%E5%98%89%E5%9B%BE%E5%90%88%E7%BA%A6%E8%8B%B1-7.jpeg)
+
+So，the Ricardian Contract wants to build is a readable document with verifiable digital signatures and unfalsifiable identifiers linked to each record. Each of the above attributes has an important meaning:
+
+> Determine what each file describes;
+
+> Whether the description is accurate;
+
+> And whether the precise description was actually agreed by the signatories;
+
+> How to ensure that the consent of the parties is indeed signed by the parties;
+
+> ......
+
+We are on guard against the need for future partial judicial decisions that require too much effort to define unclear content and not necessarily fair outcomes. The document set out above is detailed and accurate enough to be followed by evidence that it will take a lot of effort to argue if there is a real dispute. There is only one line in someone's heart:
+
+> Clearly defined in the front, want to argue? No way!
+
+Finally came the conclusion. Remember that the contract is the keystone of issuance. The innovation of the Ricardian Contract is that it is clear, untampered, unforgeabled and verifiable with the digital contract, so as to reduce disputes.
+
+As you know, how high is the cost of dispute ! And all this happened, because everyone who participated in the execution have different values, the understanding of the same thing, will have different meanings for different people. Probably the result of Lucy thinks it only be X, but Tom think is not only Y, but Z. When the cognitive and in the contract before and made no mention of the matter, assume their respective contents appear in the results will be split when disappointed. Describe a contract with a digital contract, linking each possible operation to minimize non-consensus.
+
+So there's a lot of room for this ideal model to hit a wall. For example, *Every Associated Operation*, where you can continue to imagine the future within experience, but what about the beyond experience? This requires a higher-order model to simulate ahead of time.
+
+The details of the build before the operation are too numerous to be imagined and fully covered, but it is certainly a leapfrogging structural proposal. Importantly, the contract proposal has become the consensus of a group of people who are building the world of ideas for the future.
+
+In conclusion, what did the Ricardian Contract say?
+
+Think of each issue as a contract, and the Ricardian Contract forms the basis for understanding the issue and each transaction in the issue.
+
+I hope this article will help you understand a little bit more about the Ricardian Contract. The interpretation may be biased. This article first language is Chinese, and the link is <https://steemit.com/eos/@eoshenzhen/6ipbwb> 《李嘉图合约究竟讲了什么》
+
+Conference :
+*The Ricardian Contract, Ian Grigg*
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/internationalization/.DS_Store b/internationalization/.DS_Store
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c67cf74
Binary files /dev/null and b/internationalization/.DS_Store differ
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/.DS_Store b/internationalization/Chinese/.DS_Store
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f47055c
Binary files /dev/null and b/internationalization/Chinese/.DS_Store differ
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/.DS_Store b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/.DS_Store
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c65ce88
Binary files /dev/null and b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/.DS_Store differ
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-bidname-rc.md b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-bidname-rc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0c4a1c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-bidname-rc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+# Action - {bidname}
+
+{{bidname}这个动作指对一个高级帐户名进行投标，众多周知是价高者得。作为一个被授权方，我{签名者}愿意代表{{投标人}进行投标购买[{新名称}]帐户名。
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-buyram-rc.md b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-buyram-rc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d99cb96
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-buyram-rc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+# Action - {{ buyram }}
+## 描述
+
+这一action将试图为{{receiver}}对RAM的{{quant}值进行保留。
+
+{{buyer}}授权本合同将{{quant}}转换为基于做市商的算法来确定的当前价格购买RAM。
+
+{{buyer}}接受被收取0.5%金额作为的费用，并且由于启用此服务所需必要值与之近似，实际收到的RAM可能略低于预期。
+
+{{buyer}}接受在出售所收到的RAM时收取0.5%的费用。
+
+{{buyers}}承认由于计算精度的限制而导致的舍入错误可能导致分配的RAM更少。
+
+{{buyer}}承认RAM的供应可能会在任何时候增加到现有计算机设备的极限，这可能导致RAM会以低于购买价格的价格出售。
+
+{{buyers}}承认RAM的价格可能随着时间的推移会根据供求进行增加或减少。
+
+{{buyer}} 承认RAM是不可转让的。
+
+{{buyer}}承认他们帐户当前使用的RAM在被释放之前不能出售，释放的RAM可能受其他合同条款的约束。
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-buyrambytes-rc.md b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-buyrambytes-rc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..64dde34
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-buyrambytes-rc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+# Action - {{ buyrambytes }}
+
+## 描述
+
+此action将尝试以 {{buyer}}的名义保留关于{{receive}}的RAM字节。
+
+{{buyer}} 授权本合同转让足够的EOS token以根据市场做市商的算法确定的当前价格购买RAM。
+
+{{buyer}}接受被收取0.5%金额作为的费用，并且由于启用此服务所需必要值与之近似，实际收到的RAM可能略低于预期。
+
+{{buyer}}接受在出售所收到的RAM时收取0.5%的费用。
+
+{{buyer}}接受由于计算精度限制而导致的舍入误差可能导致分配的RAM更少。
+
+{{buyer}} 承认在任何时候，RAM的供应可能在任何时候都增加到现有计算机设备的极限，这可能导致RAM以低于购买价格的价格出售。
+
+{{buyer}} 承认RAM的价格可能随着时间的推移会根据供求而增加或减少。
+
+{{buyer}} 承认RAM是不可转让的。
+
+{{buyer}} 承认他们帐户当前使用的RAM在被释放之前不能出售，释放的RAM可能受其他合同条款的约束。
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-canceldelay-rc.md b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-canceldelay-rc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e8dffc5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-canceldelay-rc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+# Action - {{ canceldelay }}
+
+## 描述{{canceldelay}}
+
+动作的取消了现有的延迟处理。 作为授权方，我希望调用{{{canceling_auth}的权限以取消这笔ID为{{trx_id}}的交易。
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-claimrewards-rc.md b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-claimrewards-rc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9f80433
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-claimrewards-rc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+# Action - {{ claimrewards }}
+
+## 描述
+
+{{claimrewards}}操作允许一个PB(主节点或备用节点)声称系统奖励他们出块和获得选票。
+
+作为一个授权方，我希望将{{singer}}挣来的奖金存入{{owner}}帐户。
+
+
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-clause-constitution-rc.md b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-clause-constitution-rc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..74210af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-clause-constitution-rc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+[原文地址](https://github.com/EOS-Mainnet/governance/blob/master/eosio.system/eosio.system-clause-constitution-rc.md)
+
+本宪法是基于应用区块链的优势的多方所签订而成。
+
+# **第一条** **-** **不引发暴力**
+
+成员一方不得对另一方不得发起暴力或进行暴力威胁。以维护生命、自由和财产为目的的合法的起诉则不构成为发起暴力。
+
+# **第二条** **-** **不做伪证**
+
+成员应对因虚假性、误导性的作证所造成的损失承担责任，同时将丧失由此获得的任何利益。
+
+# **第三条** **-** **权利**
+
+成员之间授予合同权利和私人财产权利，除非征得所有者同意，并通过行之有效的仲裁员的裁定或通过社区投票，否则任何财产均不得转让。本宪法不为任何成员或任何成员之间创造积极的权利。
+
+# **第四条** **-** **无权购买**
+
+任何成员均不得提供或接受任何有价物以换取任何形式的投票，任何会员也不得过度影响他人的投票。
+
+# **第五条** **-** **无受托**
+
+任何成员或EOS token持有人不得以支持EOS token的价值为由承担受托责任。成员不得授权任何人为代表EOS token持有人持有集体资产、借入或订立合同。此区块链没有所有者，管理者或受托人。 因此，将不会有任何成员代表持有超过10%的eos token的利益。
+
+# **第六条** **-** **赔偿**
+
+每个成员都同意对违约行为进行处罚，包括但不限于罚款、账户损失和其他赔偿。
+
+# **第七条** **-** **开源**
+
+每个在此区块链上提供智能合约的成员均为开发人员。每个开发者都应提供免费的、开源的许可证的智能合约，每份智能合约应记录在一份描述各方意图的李嘉图协议中，并命名仲裁论坛来解决因合同引起的争议。
+
+# **第八条** **-** **语言**
+
+在发生争议时，含有多语言合同必须指定一种为主流语言，并且任何翻译的作者应对由于其虚假性、误导性或模糊的经证明的翻译所引起的损失承担责任。
+
+# **第九条** **-** **争议的解决**
+
+凡因本宪法引起的或与本宪法有关的任何争议，均应由根据本宪法任命的一名或多名仲裁员根据EOS核心仲裁论坛的争议解决规则予以解决。
+
+# **第十条** **-** **法律的选择**
+
+争端的法律选择应当按照优先次序，并遵从本宪法和公平原则。
+
+# **第十一条** **-** **修正**
+
+本宪法及其附属文件不得修改，除非有超过15%的token持有者进行投票，并且在每120天内有超过连续30天投票率不低于10% 。
+
+# **第十二条** **-** **发布**
+
+成员只能向区块链发布他们有权限发布的信息。此外，成员自愿同意所有成员永久和不可撤销地保留一份副本、并分析和发布所有相关事务和衍生信息。
+
+# **第十三条** **-** **知情同意**
+
+提供工具的所有服务提供商应向其他成员提供本宪法和本宪法约定的完整的李嘉图合同条款及其他引用的合同文件，因未向用户披露李嘉图协议的全部合同条款而造成的损失，由服务提供商自行承担责任。
+
+# **第十四条** **-** **可分割性**
+
+如果本宪法的任何部分被宣布为不可执行或无效，其余部分将继续有效且可强制执行。
+
+# **第十五条** **-** **终止协议**
+
+在该成员签署的最后一笔交易被并入区块链的3年之后，该成员将自动解除本宪法规定的所有可撤销义务。经过3年的不活跃期后，一个帐户可能会被拍卖和收益分配给所有成员根据系统合同的规定，然后再进行有效的重新分配。
+
+# **第十六条** **-** **开发者责任**
+
+对软件开发人员在编写合同时非有意地造成的错误，成员们均认定为是**无恶意的。**无论这些错误是否是由于实际的或可察觉的疏忽而造成的。
+
+# **第十七条** **-** **审议**
+
+本宪法规定的所有权利和义务是相互的和相互的，对所有各方都具有同等重要的价值和损失。
+
+# **第十八条** **-** **接受**
+
+当成员签署一项包含一个TAPOS证明交易的合同时该交易的默认状态包含了一份合同的ABI，且被同步到区块链中，即证明该合同已经被区块链接受。
+
+# **第十九条** **-** **副本**
+
+本宪法可以有任意数量的副本执行，每一份副本在执行和交付时应构成一份副本原件，但所有副本应共同构成一份协议。
+
+# **第二十条** **-** **临时宪法**
+
+这部宪法是临时的，直至永久宪法通过公民投票的形式制定和批准之前，它都具有有效性。
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-delegatebw-rc.md b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-delegatebw-rc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c1db2c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-delegatebw-rc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+# Action - {{ delegatebw }} 
+
+## 描述 {{delegatebw}}
+
+action的目的是为bandwidth和/或CPU质押token，并可选择进行所有权的转移。 作为一个被授权方，我{{singer}}希望为CPU{{stake_cpu_quantity}}和bandwidth质押{{stake_cpu_quantity}}从{{from}}的解冻token用于使用delegatee {{to}}。 {{if transfer}} {{transfer}}我希望这些token立即被委派者拥有。 {{/if}} 作为签署者我规定：如果我不是这些token的实际拥有者，我就有证据证明我已获授权由他们的受益所有人采取这一行动。
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-newaccount-rc.md b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-newaccount-rc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..444eb5b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-newaccount-rc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Action - {{ newaccount }}
+
+## 描述
+该{{ newaccount }}action一个新帐户。
+
+作为一个被授权方，我希望行使{{creator}}的权利在名为{{name}}的系统上创建一个新帐户，以便新帐户的所有者公钥为{{owner}}并且激活公钥应为{{active}}。
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-refund-rc.md b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-refund-rc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b2724e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-refund-rc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+# Action - {{ refund }}
+
+## 描述
+
+该{{ refund }}行动的目的是在unstaking时期已经过后，将以前未质押的token退回给账户。作为被授权方，我{{signer}}希望返回{{owner}}的未质押的token。
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-regproducer-rc.md b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-regproducer-rc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5705389
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-regproducer-rc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# Action - {{ regproducer }}
+
+
+## 描述
+该{{ regproducer }}action的目的是注册一个BP候选人账户。
+
+我，{{producer}}特此提名我自己考虑当选为BP候选人。
+
+如果通过eosio合同选择{{producer}}生成块，我将使用{{producer_key}}对块进行签名，我特此证明我将保留此密钥的安全性。
+
+如果{{producer}}无法履行本合同项下的义务，我将通过以null生产者密钥重新提交本合同之后而辞职。
+
+我承认，如果一个区块符合其在创建时是有效的、确定性的、符合确定性的区块链规则，则该区块是“客观有效”的；如果它不符合这些规则，则该区块是“客观无效的”。
+
+{{producer}}特此同意在以下情况下仅使用{{producer_key}}对消息进行签名：在由块调度算法指定的时间提出一个客观有效的块，预先确认另一个生产者在调度中产生的块，我发现该块客观有效地确认了{{producer}}已收到来自其他生产者的2/3 +预确认消息的块。
+
+我在此情况下承担因下列原因导致的任何及所有可证明的损害赔偿责任：签署两个与{{producer_key}}具有相同时间戳的不同区块的提案，并在{{producer_key}}上签署具有相同区块号码的两个不同区块提案它建立在一个客观无效的区块上，签署了一个客观无效的区块的预先确认，并签署了一个确认我没有来自2/3 +其他生产者的预确认信息的区块。
+
+我在此认可，与两个或两个以上的其他BP共同签署一个时间戳或区块编号应自动被视为恶意，并受到与过去一年收到的赔偿金相等的罚款，并立即取消资格作为BP，以及其他损害赔偿。如果{{producer}}可以证明由于参考软件中的错误导致双重签名; 举证责任在{{producer}}上。
+
+我在此同意不干涉BP的选举过程。我同意处理所有发生在我创建的块中的BP选举事务，要对包含选举事务的所有客观上有效的块进行签名，并签署所有事前确认和确认，以方便将控制权移交给下一组由系统合同确定的BP。
+
+我在此承认根据BP之间商定的标准，在{{producer}}无法生产数据块或无法联系的情况下2/3 +其他当选BP可能会投票取消{{producer}}的资格。
+
+如果{{producer}}有资格并选择因收到投票而收取报酬，{{producer}}将提供一个公共端点，允许至少100个伙伴节点与区块链保持同步和/或提交要包含的交易。{{producer}}应保持至少1个有完整状态和签名检查的验证节点，并应报告活动BP生成的客观无效块。报告应通过BP同意的方法进行、方法和报告应公开。
+
+该社区同意允许{{producer}}根据需要对伙伴节点进行身份验证，以防止滥用和否认服务攻击; 然而，{{producer}}同意不歧视非滥用的伙伴节点。
+
+我同意以力所能及的方式处理交易，并诚实地为计量交易执行时间。
+
+我{{producer}}同意不操纵块的内容以从以下方面获得利润：包含交易的顺序包含生产块的哈希值。
+
+我{{producer}}在此同意披露并承诺若我的公司拥有超过10％的所有最终受益，则所有人和所有直接股东均受到惩罚。
+
+我{{producer}}在此同意与其他BP合作履行本协议下我们各自的相互义务，包括但不限于维护网络稳定性和有效的区块链。
+
+我{{producer}}同意维护一个托管于{{url}}的网站，其中包含有关本合同所要求的所有披露信息的最新信息。
+
+我{{producer}}同意设置{{location}}，使{{producer}}在我的上一个和下一个伙伴节点之间实现最小延迟。
+
+我{{producer}}同意在全球原子钟时间的10毫秒内使用BP之间商定的方法保持时间同步。
+
+我{{producer}}同意在我的预定时间之前不生成块，除非我收到了之前BP生成的所有块。
+
+我{{producer}}同意不发布时间戳超过500毫秒的块，除非先前块的CPU或网络bandwidth指标超过75％。
+
+我{{producer}}同意不将RAM供应设置为比我的节点包含更多的RAM，并且如果我无法提供2/3 +BP批准的内存，请辞职，正如系统参数所示。
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-sellram-rc.md b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-sellram-rc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..55a2d25
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-sellram-rc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+# Action - {{ sellram }} 
+
+## 描述
+
+该{{ sellram }}action出售未使用的token RAM。作为被授权方，我{{signer}}希望从账户{{account }}出售未使用的RAM{{bytes}}。 
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-setprods-rc.md b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-setprods-rc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8eab172
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-setprods-rc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Action - {{ setprods }}
+
+## 描述
+该{{ setprods }}行动创建了一个活跃BP的新时间表，他们将按照给定的顺序生成块。
+这是系统命令，用户无法直接访问。
+作为被授权方，我希望将BP的轮换设置为{{schedule}}。
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-undelegatebw-rc.md b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-undelegatebw-rc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f6254a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-undelegatebw-rc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+# Action - {{ undelegatebw }}
+
+# 描述
+该`{{ undelegatebw }}`行动的目的是从CPU和/或bandwidth中取消token。
+作为被授权方，`{{signer}}`希望使用`{{unstake_net_quantity}}`中的`{{unstake_net_quantity}}`从`{{from}}`所拥有的token的bandwidth中释放出来，以便委托使用`{{to}}` 。
+如果我作为签名人不是这些token的受益所有人，我规定：我有证据证明我已被授权由其实益拥有人采取此行动。
+
+
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-unregprod-rc.md b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-unregprod-rc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b17eb2d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-unregprod-rc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Action - {{ unregprod }}
+
+## 描述
+该`{{ unregprod }}`操作取消注册以前的BP候选者。
+作为被授权方，我希望取消注册BP候选人`{{producer}}`，使候选人不再能够获得选票。
+
diff --git a/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-voteproducer-rc.md b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-voteproducer-rc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2c5d403
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internationalization/Chinese/eosio.system/eosio.system-voteproducer-rc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+# Action - {{ voteproducer }}
+
+## 描述
+该`{{ voteproducer }}`行动的目的是为多达30名BP候选人进行有效投票。
+作为被授权方，我希望以`{{voter}}`的名义投票支持BP候选人`{{producers}}`，其投票权重等同于`{{voter}}`目前拥有的所有token，并且用于CPU或bandwidth。
+如果我不是这些股份的受益所有人，我规定我有证据证明我已被授权由其受益所有人投票。
+我规定，我没有也不会接受任何有价物品来换取这些票，罚没收这些代币和其他处罚。
+我承认，使用任何自动投票，重新投票或投票更新的系统，或者允许我代表他人或代表他人使用这样的系统，是被禁止的、且违反了本合同。
+
+