Permalink
Switch branches/tags
Nothing to show
Commits on Jan 31, 2011
  1. 天啊!終於完成了(淚)

    ETBlue committed Jan 31, 2011
Commits on Jan 15, 2011
  1. 最後潤飾,進度:#744

    ETBlue committed Jan 15, 2011
Commits on Jan 13, 2011
  1. 最後潤飾,進度: #497

    ETBlue committed Jan 13, 2011
Commits on Jan 11, 2011
  1. 最後潤飾,進度: #206

    ETBlue committed Jan 11, 2011
  2. 最後潤飾,進度:#95

    ETBlue committed Jan 11, 2011
  3. 最後潤飾,進度:#38

    ETBlue committed Jan 11, 2011
Commits on Jan 9, 2011
  1. 潤稿與校正,進度:#479

    ETBlue committed Jan 9, 2011
Commits on Jan 7, 2011
  1. reviewing...#371

    ETBlue committed Jan 7, 2011
Commits on Dec 16, 2010
  1. 順稿中, 進度: #165

    ETBlue committed Dec 16, 2010
Commits on Dec 15, 2010
  1. reviewing...

    ETBlue committed Dec 15, 2010
Commits on Nov 29, 2010
  1. checking

    ETBlue committed Nov 29, 2010
Commits on Nov 27, 2010
  1. draft progress: 100 %

    ETBlue committed Nov 27, 2010
Commits on Nov 25, 2010
  1. draft progress: 84%

    ETBlue committed Nov 25, 2010
Commits on Nov 15, 2010
  1. draft progress: 72%

    ETBlue committed Nov 15, 2010
Commits on Oct 31, 2010
Commits on Oct 30, 2010
  1. draft progress: 58 %

    ETBlue committed Oct 30, 2010
Commits on Oct 25, 2010
  1. draft progress: 46 %

    ETBlue committed Oct 25, 2010
Commits on Oct 21, 2010
  1. draft progress: 39%

    ETBlue committed Oct 21, 2010
Commits on Oct 20, 2010
  1. draft progress: 28%. wahahaha!

    ETBlue committed Oct 20, 2010
Commits on Oct 17, 2010
  1. draft progress: 3%

    ETBlue committed Oct 17, 2010
Commits on Aug 28, 2010
  1. review migration translation

    ihower committed Aug 28, 2010
Commits on Aug 27, 2010
  1. The call-seq directive has no useful effect on our documentation and …

    tilsammans committed Aug 27, 2010
    …is not used anywhere else.
    
    Worse still, its use breaks some rdoc, replacing method names with a curly brace.
    Having just one call-seq directive doesn't add anything since this is covered by regular rdoc.
    Having multiple might make sense, but these are already documented with examples.
    
    This partly re-reverts 60de0e5 but does not
    touch the vendorized code in html-scanner.
  2. Use common terminology

    tilsammans committed Aug 27, 2010
  3. Revert "call-seq directive makes rdoc cry and replaces method names w…

    fxn committed Aug 27, 2010
    …ith a curly brace; besides it doesn't add anything when you only list one call example since this is obviously documented already"
    
    Reason: Part of this commit touches vendorized stuff, the rest is fine, could you please repatch?
    
    This reverts commit 60de0e5.
  4. solves everything in guides raised by WARNINGS=1 (except for one whic…

    fxn committed Aug 27, 2010
    …h is abandoned atm)
  5. adds a comment in cli.rb so that it is clear that exec_script_rails! …

    fxn committed Aug 26, 2010
    …performs an exec call
  6. call-seq directive makes rdoc cry and replaces method names with a cu…

    tilsammans committed Aug 27, 2010
    …rly brace; besides it doesn't add anything when you only list one call example since this is obviously documented already