Native API Hook - retrieve trampoline bypass address #155

Closed
rramk opened this Issue Nov 28, 2016 · 8 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@rramk

rramk commented Nov 28, 2016

This is an enhancement request, follow up from https://github.com/EasyHook/EasyHook/issues/152, to expose "OldProc" member in an accessible manner.

@spazzarama spazzarama added this to the 2.8 milestone Nov 28, 2016

@rramk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rramk

rramk Dec 27, 2016

Hi @spazzarama Can you kindly tell an estimated date when the 2.8 milestone/version would be released??

rramk commented Dec 27, 2016

Hi @spazzarama Can you kindly tell an estimated date when the 2.8 milestone/version would be released??

@rramk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rramk

rramk Feb 9, 2017

@spazzarama , Can you please comment on the estimated release date of 2.8 milestone ??

rramk commented Feb 9, 2017

@spazzarama , Can you please comment on the estimated release date of 2.8 milestone ??

@spazzarama

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@spazzarama

spazzarama Feb 11, 2017

Member

@rramk I've started changes for 2.8. I should have them completed within a few weeks.

Member

spazzarama commented Feb 11, 2017

@rramk I've started changes for 2.8. I should have them completed within a few weeks.

@spazzarama spazzarama changed the title from Native API Hook to Native API Hook - retrieve trampoline by-pass address Feb 11, 2017

@spazzarama spazzarama changed the title from Native API Hook - retrieve trampoline by-pass address to Native API Hook - retrieve trampoline bypass address Feb 11, 2017

@spazzarama spazzarama self-assigned this Feb 11, 2017

@spazzarama

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
Member

spazzarama commented Feb 11, 2017

@rramk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rramk

rramk Feb 19, 2017

@spazzarama, the fix works with the pre-release 2.7.6251.0 binaries. Thank you. So, by when can I expect the 2.8 stable binaries?

rramk commented Feb 19, 2017

@spazzarama, the fix works with the pre-release 2.7.6251.0 binaries. Thank you. So, by when can I expect the 2.8 stable binaries?

@spazzarama

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@spazzarama

spazzarama Feb 22, 2017

Member

@rramk thanks for checking out the fix. I'm not sure exactly when I will get a 2.8 release done, as there are quite a few tasks for that release. I'll look at doing a new 2.7 release with this change instead as it is fairly minor.

Member

spazzarama commented Feb 22, 2017

@rramk thanks for checking out the fix. I'm not sure exactly when I will get a 2.8 release done, as there are quite a few tasks for that release. I'll look at doing a new 2.7 release with this change instead as it is fairly minor.

@rramk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rramk

rramk Feb 28, 2017

That would be great. Thanks. So, Can I know the expected date for the 2.7 release with this fix?

rramk commented Feb 28, 2017

That would be great. Thanks. So, Can I know the expected date for the 2.7 release with this fix?

@spazzarama spazzarama closed this in a26ea81 Mar 2, 2017

@spazzarama

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@spazzarama

spazzarama Mar 2, 2017

Member

Nuget released

Member

spazzarama commented Mar 2, 2017

Nuget released

@spazzarama spazzarama modified the milestones: 2.7 Stable, 2.8 Mar 2, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment