EFSP 1.1

[waynebeaton]

Let's use this as a container, or umbrella bug to address updates to the Eclipse Foundation Specification Process. I'd like to make this a minor revision (so no structural changes).

For this first revision, I'd like to address the following:

• Add consideration of Maintenance Releases; (Formalize Maintenance Reviews #1)
• An "Individual Participant" is defined in terms of an "individual Committer", but "individual Committer" is not defined;
• Ensure that it is clear that a "Member Participant" is a member of the Working Group; (Clarify that we mean strategic members that participate in the working group #5) and
• Move "The Specification Project creation process" diagram to a supporting document (this diagram feels out of place here).

Is there anything else to address in this iteration?

(copied from Bug 543224)

[waynebeaton]

From @rmonson (moved to #7)

I would recommend removing the following "may also be referred to as a Maintenance Release" as it confuses things especially later in the document when you use only the term "service" . I know why its there but I think we have to settle on "Service" or "Maintenance Release" but not both.

I would add something like this to the Service release definition to ensure that it limited to very minor changes.

"A Service Release does not include any significant new features and/or breaking changes"

[waynebeaton]

I'm going to defer this to a future iteration:

An "Individual Participant" is defined in terms of an "individual Committer", but "individual Committer" is not defined;

With this, I believe that all issues have been addressed.