Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 27, 2021. It is now read-only.

Values for $n$ greater than 2 create very significant gaps between CVSS scores in the high and critical range. #3

EdOverflow opened this issue Dec 1, 2017 · 1 comment


Copy link


richinseattle notified me of an interesting issue in our formula when supplying it with values greater than 2 for n.


Steps To Reproduce

Set n to a value greater than 2. I am using n = 6 below.

$$N = \frac{10000}{(10)^6}$$

$$b = N \times (C^6)$$


There is a very large gap between the bounty amount for a CVSS score of 9.0 versus a score of 10.0 — namely $5314 for 9.0 and $10'000 for 10.0.


Potential Solutions

The following are some potential solutions that may even be combined to resolve this problem and other problem for n in the future.

  1. Create an S-curve as richinseattle pointed out. [1]
  2. Form pairs of CVSS scores. [2]
  3. Base the bounty on the maximum value in the CVSS rating rather than basing it off the CVSS score. This is similar to approach 2).
  4. Base n on a large data set. This would allow us to create "realistic" values for n for the three categories mentioned in the write-up. [3]
@EdOverflow EdOverflow added the bug label Dec 1, 2017
Copy link
Owner Author

We believe that our latest version of the formula resolves this problem by forcing n to be within the 1.0 to 3.0 range.


We also suggested that users decrease n as b_{max} increases.

We recommend setting a lower value for n as you increase b_{max}. This should ensure that the gap between values in the 7.0 to 10.0 CVSS score range is not too big.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
None yet

No branches or pull requests

1 participant