Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 27, 2020. It is now read-only.

g_mmpbsa calculation #510

Closed
dplizyy opened this issue Apr 8, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

g_mmpbsa calculation #510

dplizyy opened this issue Apr 8, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@dplizyy
Copy link

dplizyy commented Apr 8, 2018

Hi, developers of APBS,

Here I report a bug of APBS in reading PQR file.

I have some PQR files in ambPQR format. When I run APBS calculation, I got the following error information:

Parsing input file p2AaZppA.in...
NOsh: Deprecated use of ION keyword! Use key-value pairs
NOsh: Deprecated use of ION keyword! Use key-value pairs
NOsh: Deprecated use of ION keyword! Use key-value pairs
NOsh: Deprecated use of ION keyword! Use key-value pairs
Parsed input file.
Got paths for 1 molecules
Reading PQR-format atom data from p2AaZppA.pqr.
Valist_readPQR: Error parsing atom 1!
Please double check this atom in the pqr file, e.g., make sure there are no concatenated fields.
Error reading molecules!

After checking the PQR file, I found that the first and last residues'name were wrong in the PQR file:

ATOM 1 N NALA 192 -51.730-160.850 81.990 0.141 1.550
ATOM 2 H1 NALA 192 -50.730-160.800 82.120 0.200 1.200
ATOM 3 H2 NALA 192 -52.140-160.040 82.420 0.200 1.200
ATOM 4 H3 NALA 192 -51.990-161.700 82.470 0.200 1.200
ATOM 5 CA NALA 192 -52.130-160.830 80.570 0.096 1.700
ATOM 6 HA NALA 192 -51.570-161.650 80.140 0.089 1.200
ATOM 7 CB NALA 192 -51.670-159.560 79.850 -0.060 1.700
ATOM 8 HB1 NALA 192 -52.140-159.700 78.880 0.030 1.200
ATOM 9 HB2 NALA 192 -52.260-158.770 80.330 0.030 1.200
ATOM 10 HB3 NALA 192 -50.600-159.430 79.970 0.030 1.200
ATOM 11 C NALA 192 -53.620-161.060 80.360 0.616 1.700
ATOM 12 O NALA 192 -54.370-160.550 81.190 -0.572 1.520
ATOM 13 N PRO 193 -54.010-161.690 79.250 -0.255 1.550
ATOM 14 CD PRO 193 -53.210-162.380 78.260 0.019 1.700
.
.
.
ATOM 3581 HE2 MET 422 -68.070-154.080 47.280 0.068 1.200
ATOM 3582 HE3 MET 422 -66.950-152.980 46.560 0.068 1.200
ATOM 3583 C MET 422 -71.000-158.100 45.100 0.597 1.700
ATOM 3584 O MET 422 -70.500-158.810 44.220 -0.568 1.520
ATOM 3585 N CASP 423 -72.210-157.550 44.990 -0.519 1.550
ATOM 3586 H CASP 423 -72.480-156.960 45.760 0.306 1.200
ATOM 3587 CA CASP 423 -72.990-157.520 43.760 -0.182 1.700
ATOM 3588 HA CASP 423 -72.710-158.360 43.130 0.105 1.200
ATOM 3589 CB CASP 423 -74.500-157.710 43.950 -0.068 1.700
ATOM 3590 HB1 CASP 423 -75.010-157.920 43.010 -0.021 1.200
ATOM 3591 HB2 CASP 423 -74.910-156.790 44.350 -0.021 1.200
ATOM 3592 CG CASP 423 -74.850-158.840 44.900 0.885 1.700
ATOM 3593 OD1 CASP 423 -74.440-159.970 44.570 -0.816 1.520
ATOM 3594 OD2 CASP 423 -75.600-158.630 45.890 -0.816 1.520
ATOM 3595 C CASP 423 -72.640-156.360 42.850 0.726 1.700
ATOM 3596 OC1 CASP 423 -72.580-156.480 41.600 -0.789 1.520
ATOM 3597 OC2 CASP 423 -72.380-155.260 43.370 -0.789 1.520
ATOM 3598 C7 LIG 424 -54.410-155.360 49.800 -0.267 1.700
ATOM 3599 C4 LIG 424 -54.560-156.630 50.140 -0.072 1.700
ATOM 3600 C3 LIG 424 -54.430-157.030 51.590 -0.296 1.700
ATOM 3601 C2 LIG 424 -53.550-158.280 51.780 0.345 1.700
ATOM 3602 C1 LIG 424 -53.900-159.420 50.820 -0.051 1.700

@sobolevnrm
Copy link
Member

sobolevnrm commented Apr 9, 2018 via email

@dplizyy
Copy link
Author

dplizyy commented Apr 9, 2018 via email

@kozlac
Copy link
Contributor

kozlac commented Apr 11, 2018

Hello @dplizyy , like @sobolevnrm said, the problem arises from the concatenated fields. You mentioned that you did not use PDB2PQR to obtain this file. Which software did you use?

@dplizyy
Copy link
Author

dplizyy commented Apr 16, 2018 via email

@sobolevnrm
Copy link
Member

The code is behaving as expected; the coordinates need to be separated by whitespace.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants