Skip to content

Conversation

@osipovartem
Copy link
Contributor

@osipovartem osipovartem commented Feb 17, 2025

Related to #264

Combined docker image (init)

Set variable, set entity within session (#232)

* Set variable, set entity

* Fix comments

Rename multipart field to camelCase (#238)

* Rename multipart field to camelCase

* small improvement

Refine http status codes (#237)

* fix dbt retry

* fmt

* more retries fixed

Try to get catalog name from session with fallback to default (#239)

less redundancy in manifest (#242)

Fixing CORS to allow Cookies from UI (#235)

* Fixing CORS to allow Cookies from UI

* Formatting fix

* Clippy fixes

* Adding flag to enable CORS

* Adjusting CORS arg name

Add CONTIBUTING.md draft (#240)

* Add CONTIBUTING.md draft

* Updating CONTRIBUTING and CODE_OF_CONDUCT

* Renaming

---------

Co-authored-by: Scott Lyons <scottalyons@gmail.com>

Renaming icehut -> icebucket (#244)

* Rename IceHut -> IceBucket

* Formatting fix

Adding workflow to generator a list of contributors (#246)

Updating README structure with new name (#245)

* Initial README restructuring

* Update README.md (#234)

* Updating README with new name

* Adding LICENSE file

* Fixing LICENSE

---------

Co-authored-by: DanCodedThis <94703934+DanCodedThis@users.noreply.github.com>

Changing contributor script (#248)

* Adding workflow to generator a list of contributors

* Changing contributor script

Make SP endpoint optional (#250)

Tmp tyr to build

Dockerfile update

Add file system storage profile

Add file system storage profile
return Err(ControlPlaneModelError::InvalidBucketName {
bucket_name: String::new(),
reason: "Bucket name is required".to_owned(),
reason: "Region name is required".to_owned(),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ControlPlaneModelError::InvalidBucketName -> ControlPlaneModelError::InvalidRegion?

@osipovartem osipovartem merged commit 15b9674 into main Feb 18, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@osipovartem osipovartem deleted the issues/264_test_coverage branch February 18, 2025 08:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants