Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Should we add seasons? #253
Comments
|
We should definitely add seasons. I agree that processes are the way to go, with links to qualities and conditions. Weather and climate will be important here. |
pbuttigieg
added interesting-discussion high priority
labels
Sep 22, 2015
|
First attempt: Thus:
Seasons are usually 'centred' around things like equinoxes and solstices, which can provide the central point for the fiat boundary. Thoughts? |
Would imply that a season is a process. Probably best to say that it is a temporal window that overlaps with part of a seasonal change process. This also is more compatible with thoughts from @phismith |
phismith
commented
Dec 15, 2015
|
a season is a 2-dimensional temporal interval this applies both to the calendar sense and to the sense used in e.g. BS On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Pier Luigi Buttigieg <
|
cmungall commentedSep 22, 2015
Seasons can be modeled as occurrents, analogous to developmental stages. They may have canonical starts and stops that are region specific (just as developmental stages have canonical start and end times in a species) but these may not be constant.
The use case here is axiomatizing condition ontologies such as the planteome EO ontology:
(note that the EO terms should obviously be suffixed with "condition" to distinguish them from actual seasons)
occurrent has the following children:
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000003
I think process is the most natural here.
An argument could be made that modeling of qualities would be better; but I think it has to be something with temporal boundaries.