Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Definition for 'waste' #262
Comments
mark-jensen
referenced
this issue
in SDG-InterfaceOntology/sdgio
Nov 17, 2015
Closed
Define 'waste' as a role #35
|
Agreed. I've changed the label of ENVO:
Wikipedia has some references to UNEP and UNSD definitions which support the intentionality and also the process product points of view. I've also added the "material" suffix to the current subclasses of |
pbuttigieg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 18, 2015
|
|
pbuttigieg |
294dd4f
|
|
@cmungall this may be of interest to UBERON's |
|
The Chemical Methods Ontology has a class whose semantics look about right for planned processes dealing with waste. It just needs a bit of generalisation. |
|
@mark-jensen I think we can have Also, @phsmith, is it correct to speak of waste as a |
pbuttigieg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 18, 2015
|
|
pbuttigieg |
b65def6
|
mark-jensen
commented
Jan 12, 2016
None at all. There may be the need to refer to the process of @pbuttigieg Any more thoughts on defining This will most certainly lead to consideration of |
|
We should come up with some design patterns for processes involving processing of materials, e.g. strawman:
we can imagine a big cross-product, e.g. {disposal,transport,management} of {industrial,agriculatural,household,..} waste. Once we have the patterns defined it's easy to manage this hierarchy but ultimately we may want to do this in LEGO. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste_management may be a better start than I would avoid assertion under |
mark-jensen commentedNov 17, 2015
Propose that 'waste' be defined as a role
'waste' = A role that is realized in some process wherein the bearer is discarded or not utilized.
Perhaps add "...in some production or consumption process..."
Perhaps make label 'waste role'
Then: 'waste' is equivalent to ('independent continuant' AND 'bearer of' SOME 'waste role' )