Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fuel classification #433
Comments
Materials BranchWe have:
Note that "oil" is defined generically (A viscous liquid state at ambient temperatures or slightly warmer, and is both hydrophobic and lipophilic) and could encompass e.g. olive oil from FoodOn. Is the classification of paraffin correct? "fuel oil" is undefined "aviation fuel" seems a bit random. Undefined. Is this intended to be defined by role (e.g. any fuel used in aviation?). I think it is better to define this (and relabel) as "jet fuel" We could subdivide "oil" by origin:
But would this be useful? We could add a new class for "petroleum product", defined as any material derived from petroleum (crude oil), and define different oil distillation products here... but feels like overmodelling for ENVO purposes. We use the chebi class 'fossil fuel' for has-role assignments:
IMHO, the job of the CHEBI role branch is to define roles. 'fossil fuel' sits uneasily in role. I think fossil fuel should be defined as a material entity that has fuel role and has the necessary derivation conditions. We are probably not the right people to do this classification, and ISO standards and so on exist in this area. But I feel we could go some way to improving this. |
cmungall commentedOct 24, 2016
Taking data from here:
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/waste-management/waste-management-rules-data/underground-storage-tanks-databases
I'd like to map these: