Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Homogenise replaced by / consider APs #507
Comments
pbuttigieg
added the
enhancement
label
May 3, 2017
pbuttigieg
self-assigned this
May 3, 2017
|
It's standard to use CURIEs (in hindsight, this is perhaps suboptimal).
We can easily have a script that normalizes these.
…
|
|
@cmungall Many thanks - yes, this is easy to do. We're just making sure we're compliant while building out the AGRO driven fieldbooks. |
pbuttigieg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 4, 2017
|
|
pbuttigieg |
0e30ce4
|
The codeA bit hacky, but appears to work. Advice on smarter ways to do this always appreciated
The diff
|
|
The |
pbuttigieg
closed this
May 4, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
pbuttigieg commentedMay 3, 2017
Some are CURIE style ENVO IDs, others are IRIs entered via the Protege interface.
@cmungall is there a best practice recommendation on what the value of
replaced byorconsiderAPs should point to?