Replace scikit GB with XGB in docs #88
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rhiever
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2016
Replace scikit GB with XGB in docs
|
Thanks @tcfuji, you rock! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Replaces the scikit GB classifier with the XGB classifier in the docs.
Where should the reviewer start?
mkdocs.yml, ref_index.md, and XGBClassifier.md. Also made a minor change in tpot.py.
How should this PR be tested?
Don't think so.
Any background context you want to provide?
This fixes what was discussed in the previous XGBoost PR. #83
What are the relevant issues?
#83
Screenshots (if appropriate)
Questions:
They are being updated in this PR.
No