Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI-SKIP] Automatically publish 2.x javadocs #4083

Merged
merged 5 commits into from May 1, 2021
Merged

[CI-SKIP] Automatically publish 2.x javadocs #4083

merged 5 commits into from May 1, 2021

Conversation

mdcfe
Copy link
Member

@mdcfe mdcfe commented Mar 24, 2021

Details

Proposed feature:
Automatically publish the EssentialsX (core) javadoc to Netlify using GitHub Actions.

The uploaded documentation can be viewed at https://jd-v2.essentialsx.net.

Copy link
Member Author

@mdcfe mdcfe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems to build netlify/actions on each run - may be worth separating out into separate workflow so as not to slow down PRs

@mdcfe mdcfe marked this pull request as draft March 24, 2021 13:01
@mdcfe mdcfe marked this pull request as ready for review March 24, 2021 14:51
@mdcfe mdcfe added the type: enhancement Features and feature requests. label Mar 24, 2021
JRoy
JRoy previously approved these changes Mar 25, 2021
DoNotSpamPls
DoNotSpamPls previously approved these changes Apr 28, 2021
@JRoy JRoy dismissed stale reviews from DoNotSpamPls and themself via 0e638b5 May 1, 2021 19:56
@JRoy JRoy changed the title Automatically publish 2.x javadocs [CI-SKIP] Automatically publish 2.x javadocs May 1, 2021
@JRoy JRoy merged commit 312ff11 into 2.x May 1, 2021
@JRoy JRoy deleted the misc/gh-actions-jd branch May 1, 2021 20:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement Features and feature requests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants