Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Custom Stylesheets in Redactor #1425

Closed
bsrweb opened this issue Oct 13, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2339
Closed

Feature Request: Custom Stylesheets in Redactor #1425

bsrweb opened this issue Oct 13, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2339
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@bsrweb
Copy link

bsrweb commented Oct 13, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I really appreciate the option to use the native RTE with the option to use Redactor to view the HMTL source code, a feature taken away in WYGWAM/CKeditor. But, WYGWAM/CKeditor allowed the use of custom stylesheets (among other features) so text formatting in the CP matches the design of the site and it would be great to get this feature when using Redactor.

Reasoning: Not a great UX for content editors when they see mis-matching styles when editing page content in the CP. WYSIWYG should be as close as possible to WYSIWY-really-G.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Currently, there's only one choice if we require the RTE to allow editors to view source.

Alternative Solution

Allow WYGWAM, a paid plugin, the choice to use Redactor and have feature-parity with CKeditor:

  • custom stylesheets
  • paste-from-Word-cleanup
  • etc.
@bsrweb bsrweb changed the title Custom Stylesheets in Redactor Feature Request: Custom Stylesheets in Redactor Oct 13, 2021
@intoeetive intoeetive added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 28, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants