Add shared warm-build fast path to Teensy orchestrator#156
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 58 minutes and 16 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Filed follow-up #157 so the fast-path cache contract gets centralized instead of being open-coded per orchestrator. The requirement is that all cache-relevant artifacts go through one shared orchestrator/pipeline contract so builders and platforms do not drift on required-artifact lists, fingerprint persistence, or side outputs like compile databases. |
Summary
Verification
Scope
This is a partial issue #121 PR for the clean remaining Teensy subtask only. It does not address AVR, RP2040, STM32, or the rest of the issue.