Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

When saving data type text in a field of type blob subtype 1, the information is being saved in binary form. [ODBC110] #107

Closed
firebird-issue-importer opened this issue Mar 5, 2011 · 5 comments

Comments

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Mar 5, 2011

Submitted by: Roberto Carlos da Silva (robertosistemas)

Is duplicated by ODBC119

When saving data type text in a field of type blob subtype 1, the information is being saved in binary form.

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Mar 5, 2011

Commented by: @alexpotapchenko

How you insert data? Can you provide test case?

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Mar 7, 2011

Commented by: @alexpotapchenko

If the charset is correct, then saving into blob subtype 1 works fine.

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Mar 7, 2011

Modified by: @alexpotapchenko

status: Open [ 1 ] => Resolved [ 5 ]

resolution: Cannot Reproduce [ 5 ]

Fix Version: 2.0 RC2 [ 10320 ]

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Jun 11, 2011

Modified by: @alexpotapchenko

Link: This issue is duplicated by ODBC119 [ ODBC119 ]

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Jun 11, 2011

Modified by: @alexpotapchenko

status: Resolved [ 5 ] => Closed [ 6 ]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants