Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New builtin function DATEADD() implements wrong choice of keywords for expanded syntax [CORE1497] #1912

Closed
firebird-issue-importer opened this issue Oct 4, 2007 · 6 comments

Comments

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Oct 4, 2007

Submitted by: @asfernandes

Is related to QA267

Change syntax from

DATEADD( [<number>] <timestamp_part> FOR <date_time> )

to

DATEADD( [<number>] <timestamp_part> TO <date_time> )

Commits: bad4ef9

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Oct 4, 2007

Modified by: @asfernandes

status: Open [ 1 ] => Resolved [ 5 ]

resolution: Fixed [ 1 ]

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Jan 28, 2008

Modified by: @pcisar

Workflow: jira [ 13242 ] => Firebird [ 13985 ]

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Mar 17, 2009

Modified by: @pmakowski

status: Resolved [ 5 ] => Closed [ 6 ]

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Feb 23, 2011

Modified by: @pcisar

Link: This issue is related to QA267 [ QA267 ]

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Jan 19, 2016

Modified by: @pavel-zotov

QA Status: No test

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Jan 19, 2016

Modified by: @pavel-zotov

QA Status: No test => Done successfully

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants