New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RemoteAuxPort for SuperClassic and regular Classic [CORE2263] #2689
Comments
Modified by: @dyemanovassignee: Dmitry Yemanov [ dimitr ] |
Modified by: @dyemanovpriority: Blocker [ 1 ] => Major [ 3 ] |
Modified by: @dyemanovVersion: 2.1.1 [ 10223 ] Version: 2.0.4 [ 10211 ] Version: 2.1.0 [ 10041 ] Version: 2.0.3 [ 10200 ] Version: 2.0.2 [ 10130 ] Version: 2.0.1 [ 10090 ] Version: 2.0.0 [ 10091 ] |
Commented by: @asfernandes Should not the description be changed to [Super]Classic then? |
Modified by: @dyemanovsummary: RemoteAuxPort for SuperClassic => RemoteAuxPort for SuperClassic and regular Classic |
Modified by: @dyemanovstatus: Open [ 1 ] => In Progress [ 3 ] |
Modified by: @dyemanovstatus: In Progress [ 3 ] => Open [ 1 ] |
Modified by: @dyemanovstatus: Open [ 1 ] => Resolved [ 5 ] resolution: Fixed [ 1 ] Fix Version: 2.5 RC1 [ 10300 ] |
Modified by: @pcisarstatus: Resolved [ 5 ] => Closed [ 6 ] |
Modified by: @pavel-zotovQA Status: No test |
Modified by: @pavel-zotovstatus: Closed [ 6 ] => Closed [ 6 ] QA Status: No test => Cannot be tested |
Submitted by: Zd (zd)
SuperClassic should listen to events on a single RemoteAuxPort port just like SuperServer does.
Otherwise applications that connect to the database over the Internet (and use Firewalls or a secure tunnel) can't use events or are forced to to use SuperServer, which doesn't support multiple processors at all...
Since events are a very important feature of Firebird, this issue should be fixed as soon as possible.
Commits: ae1de3f
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: