Port to s390 (32-bit) [CORE2625] #3034
Comments
|
Commented by: Damyan Ivanov (dam) s390 port patch |
Modified by: Damyan Ivanov (dam)Attachment: firebird-s390-port.patch [ 11496 ] |
Modified by: @AlexPeshkoffassignee: Alexander Peshkov [ alexpeshkoff ] |
|
Commented by: Damyan Ivanov (dam) fix small typo |
Modified by: Damyan Ivanov (dam)description: CORE2559 addresses building on s390x architecture, which is the 64-bit variant if s390. I am attaching a patch to enhance the support also to 32-bit s390. The patch removes the -DS390X define from prefix.linux_s390x and replaces it with checks for __s390__ and __s390x__ defines which are presented by gcc. This way both ports can use one prefix file. s390 has no alignment restrictions. => CORE2559 addresses building on s390x architecture, which is the 64-bit variant of s390. I am attaching a patch to enhance the support also to 32-bit s390. The patch removes the -DS390X define from prefix.linux_s390x and replaces it with checks for __s390__ and __s390x__ defines which are presented by gcc. This way both ports can use one prefix file. s390 has no alignment restrictions. |
Modified by: @AlexPeshkoffstatus: Open [ 1 ] => Resolved [ 5 ] resolution: Fixed [ 1 ] Fix Version: 2.5 RC1 [ 10362 ] |
Modified by: @pcisarstatus: Resolved [ 5 ] => Closed [ 6 ] |
Submitted by: Damyan Ivanov (dam)
Attachments:
firebird-s390-port.patch
CORE2559 addresses building on s390x architecture, which is the 64-bit variant of s390. I am attaching a patch to enhance the support also to 32-bit s390.
The patch removes the -DS390X define from prefix.linux_s390x and replaces it with checks for __s390__ and __s390x__ defines which are presented by gcc. This way both ports can use one prefix file.
s390 has no alignment restrictions.
Commits: 2ca8251
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: