Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement new remote backup option of services API [JDBC256] #303

Closed
firebird-issue-importer opened this issue Jun 24, 2012 · 6 comments
Closed

Comments

@firebird-issue-importer

Submitted by: @mrotteveel

Depends on CORE2666

CORE2666 introduces a new services API to store a backup clientside or restore from a client-side backup file. Add an implementation to org.firebirdsql.management (eg with a streams-based API).

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Jun 24, 2012

Modified by: @mrotteveel

Link: This issue depends on CORE2666 [ CORE2666 ]

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Feb 28, 2016

Commented by: @mrotteveel

See #11

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Feb 28, 2016

Modified by: @mrotteveel

assignee: Roman Rokytskyy [ rrokytskyy ] => Mark Rotteveel [ avalanche1979 ]

Fix Version: Jaybird 3.0 [ 10440 ]

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Mar 2, 2016

Commented by: @mrotteveel

Merged

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented Mar 2, 2016

Modified by: @mrotteveel

status: Open [ 1 ] => Resolved [ 5 ]

resolution: Fixed [ 1 ]

@firebird-issue-importer
Copy link
Author

@firebird-issue-importer firebird-issue-importer commented May 7, 2017

Modified by: @mrotteveel

status: Resolved [ 5 ] => Closed [ 6 ]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants