-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NullGuard makes R# code coverage fail #83
Comments
@cmeeren i can no longer reproduce this. i suspect it was a problem with an older version of cecil. can u update to the latest of nullguard and fody and let me know if u still have the issue? |
Sorry, I don't have the time to check this for the foreseeable future. If you can't repro then it's probably fixed. Feel free to close. |
I belive this is still an issue , using DotCover 2018.1.2 and Nullguard.Fody in latest version give same error
|
Looks like this could be related to #90 |
Running ReSharper's code coverage test runner fails when using NullGuard (even if
<NullGuard />
is not added toFodyWeavers.xml
– it's sufficient thatNullGuard.Fody
is installed). The ReSharper error is:ERROR Coverage analysis: Inconsistent PDB detected, too large offset in statement table
This might be related to vanderkleij/Smocks#16, which was a very simple fix (more or less a single line).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: