Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed returned_types from definitions #316 #320

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 28, 2019
Merged

Removed returned_types from definitions #316 #320

merged 1 commit into from Feb 28, 2019

Conversation

cugu
Copy link
Contributor

@cugu cugu commented Feb 28, 2019

No description provided.

@joachimmetz
Copy link
Member

thx

@joachimmetz joachimmetz self-requested a review February 28, 2019 18:49
@joachimmetz joachimmetz self-assigned this Feb 28, 2019
@joachimmetz joachimmetz changed the title Remove returned_types Removed returned_types from definitions #316 Feb 28, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 28, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #320 into master will decrease coverage by 0.23%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #320      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.21%   90.97%   -0.24%     
==========================================
  Files           7        7              
  Lines         421      421              
==========================================
- Hits          384      383       -1     
- Misses         37       38       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
artifacts/artifact.py 95.74% <0%> (-2.13%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 71b9d2b...611a8c9. Read the comment docs.

@joachimmetz joachimmetz merged commit cdb2427 into ForensicArtifacts:master Feb 28, 2019
Copy link
Member

@joachimmetz joachimmetz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but know this does not fully fixes #316 I've added some additional steps that need to be done. That I'll take care of.

@cugu
Copy link
Contributor Author

cugu commented Feb 28, 2019

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants