font-variant-numeric

[ierhyna]

There is no information about font-variant-numeric feature support.
(MDN: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/CSS/font-variant-numeric)
Thanks!

[Ugoku]

+1

[Ugoku]

+1

[kiding]

Not only font-variant-numeric, but also many properties defined by CSS Fonts Module Level 3 are missing, which include;

• font-variant-ligatures
• font-variant-position*****
• font-variant-caps
• font-variant-numeric
• font-variant-east-asian
• font-variant (shorthand)
• font-language-override*****

***** Features at risk, may be removed in the future.

Some are only supported by Firefox, and Safari started to support them recently. I'd like to suggest we change the issue to conform with all the CSS Fonts properties.

[kiding]

Not only font-variant-numeric, but also many properties defined by CSS Fonts Module Level 3 are missing, which include;

• font-variant-ligatures
• font-variant-position*****
• font-variant-caps
• font-variant-numeric
• font-variant-east-asian
• font-variant (shorthand)
• font-language-override*****

***** Features at risk, may be removed in the future.

Some are only supported by Firefox, and Safari started to support them recently. I'd like to suggest we change the issue to conform with all the CSS Fonts properties.

[drott]

+1

[drott]

+1

[drott]

I implemented font-variant-numeric and font-variant-caps in Chrome 52, compare https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/blink-dev/p9k6H2tUADk

[drott]

I implemented font-variant-numeric and font-variant-caps in Chrome 52, compare https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/blink-dev/p9k6H2tUADk

[kiding]

@drott Very cool!

[kiding]

@drott Very cool!

[maddesigns]

+1

[maddesigns]

+1

[Megabyte-16]

+1

[Megabyte-16]

+1

[garrik]

+1

[garrik]

+1

[chharvey]

#1550 seems to have already proposed this, but I like that @kiding has enumerated out the sub-properties for all to see. @kiding, can you cite any sources on the "features at risk," i.e., where are you getting that information?

[chharvey]

#1550 seems to have already proposed this, but I like that @kiding has enumerated out the sub-properties for all to see. @kiding, can you cite any sources on the "features at risk," i.e., where are you getting that information?

[kiding]

@chharvey The W3C CSS standard has "Features at risk" section near the top of the document, right below the status section.

[kiding]

@chharvey The W3C CSS standard has "Features at risk" section near the top of the document, right below the status section.