Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More Advanced Search Parameters & HTML Refactor #3623

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jperson1
Copy link
Contributor

@jperson1 jperson1 commented Apr 9, 2024

More Advanced Search Parameters & HTML Refactor

Issues: #3576, #3622

Changes:

  1. Keep search in one HTML file (search.html, instead of search.html + advanced.html). Give every filter its own file, and conditionally render them depending on which page you're on.
  2. Add a few new filters, and change one:
    • Fiscal year end month (basic + advanced)
    • Type requirement (advanced)
    • Entity type (basic + advanced)
    • Passthrough name (advanced)
    • Report ID (basic + advanced)
    • UEI/EIN field searches the additional UEI/EIN tables in addition to general
  3. Unit tests for the new filters

How to test:

  1. Make sure you have some data loaded locally, and that your materialized view is up to date.
  2. Switch to this branch and navigate to search.
  3. Try the the new filters, and verify accuracy:
    • Fiscal year end month. Searches on currently selected audit years. Most audits are either June or December. You can check a years results and verify that about half come back when using these months.
    • Type requirement. The five most common are "P", "N", "L", "I", and "B". But, there are a huge number of valid options, and they can chain together. A good one is "ABCFGHIJLMN".
    • Entity type. It doesn't seem like there are a lot of controls on this field, because "state" comes back with a lot of audits. But, it's what's the data shows.
    • Passthrough name. Find a passthrough name locally (like "SDE"), and verify that the relevant report_ids come back in a search on it. Sometimes, there are a lot of results on one passthrough name.
    • Report ID. Try a bunch!
    • New UEI/EIN behavior. Find an audit with additional UEIs/EINs, and search on them to verify that the record now comes in, even if its general object does not represent these values.

Screenshots:

The new filters:
image

Most common type requirements in Census public data (~550 different combinations are represented):
image

PR checklist: submitters

  • Link to an issue if possible. If there’s no issue, describe what your branch does. Even if there is an issue, a brief description in the PR is still useful.
  • List any special steps reviewers have to follow to test the PR. For example, adding a local environment variable, creating a local test file, etc.
  • For extra credit, submit a screen recording like this one.
  • Make sure you’ve merged main into your branch shortly before creating the PR. (You should also be merging main into your branch regularly during development.)
  • Make sure you’ve accounted for any migrations. When you’re about to create the PR, bring up the application locally and then run git status | grep migrations. If there are any results, you probably need to add them to the branch for the PR. Your PR should have only one new migration file for each of the component apps, except in rare circumstances; you may need to delete some and re-run python manage.py makemigrations to reduce the number to one. (Also, unless in exceptional circumstances, your PR should not delete any migration files.)
  • Make sure that whatever feature you’re adding has tests that cover the feature. This includes test coverage to make sure that the previous workflow still works, if applicable.
  • Make sure the full-submission.cy.js Cypress test passes, if applicable.
  • Do manual testing locally. Our tests are not good enough yet to allow us to skip this step. If that’s not applicable for some reason, check this box.
  • Verify that no Git surgery was necessary, or, if it was necessary at any point, repeat the testing after it’s finished.
  • Once a PR is merged, keep an eye on it until it’s deployed to dev, and do enough testing on dev to verify that it deployed successfully, the feature works as expected, and the happy path for the broad feature area (such as submission) still works.

PR checklist: reviewers

  • Pull the branch to your local environment and run make docker-clean; make docker-first-run && docker compose up; then run docker compose exec web /bin/bash -c "python manage.py test"
  • Manually test out the changes locally, or check this box to verify that it wasn’t applicable in this case.
  • Check that the PR has appropriate tests. Look out for changes in HTML/JS/JSON Schema logic that may need to be captured in Python tests even though the logic isn’t in Python.
  • Verify that no Git surgery is necessary at any point (such as during a merge party), or, if it was, repeat the testing after it’s finished.

The larger the PR, the stricter we should be about these points.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2024

File Coverage Missing
All files 88%
api/serializers.py 88% 177-178 183 188
api/test_views.py 95% 103
api/uei.py 88% 87 118-119 163 167-168
api/views.py 98% 198-199 337-338
audit/forms.py 60% 31-38 109-116
audit/intake_to_dissemination.py 88% 57-62 264 308-316
audit/mixins.py 96% 27
audit/test_commands.py 91%
audit/test_intakelib.py 88% 154-158
audit/test_manage_submission_access_view.py 98% 15 19
audit/test_mixins.py 90% 159-160 164-166 254-255 259-261
audit/test_validators.py 95% 439 443 611-612 851 858 865 872 1107-1108 1139-1140 1165-1170
audit/test_views.py 98% 132
audit/test_workbooks_should_fail.py 88% 58 87-88 92
audit/test_workbooks_should_pass.py 87% 59 74-76
audit/utils.py 91% 33-35 38
audit/validators.py 93% 138 190 378-379 394-395 478-479 581-585 590-594 610-619
audit/cross_validation/additional_ueis.py 93% 33
audit/cross_validation/check_award_ref_declaration.py 90%
audit/cross_validation/check_award_reference_uniqueness.py 93%
audit/cross_validation/check_certifying_contacts.py 87%
audit/cross_validation/check_findings_count_consistency.py 91%
audit/cross_validation/check_ref_number_in_cap.py 90%
audit/cross_validation/check_ref_number_in_findings_text.py 90%
audit/cross_validation/errors.py 78% 30 77
audit/cross_validation/naming.py 93% 197
audit/cross_validation/submission_progress_check.py 95% 80
audit/cross_validation/tribal_data_sharing_consent.py 81% 33 36 40
audit/cross_validation/validate_general_information.py 64% 72 76-79 91 94
audit/fixtures/single_audit_checklist.py 55% 147-184 230-239
audit/intakelib/exceptions.py 71% 7-9 12
audit/intakelib/intermediate_representation.py 91% 27-28 73 91 129 200-203 212-213 283-284
audit/intakelib/mapping_audit_findings.py 97% 55
audit/intakelib/mapping_audit_findings_text.py 97% 54
audit/intakelib/mapping_federal_awards.py 93% 92
audit/intakelib/mapping_util.py 79% 21 25 29 63 99 104-105 114-120 130 145 150
audit/intakelib/checks/check_all_unique_award_numbers.py 79% 24
audit/intakelib/checks/check_cluster_names.py 75% 20-25
audit/intakelib/checks/check_cluster_total.py 95% 99
audit/intakelib/checks/check_has_all_the_named_ranges.py 95% 66
audit/intakelib/checks/check_is_a_workbook.py 69% 20
audit/intakelib/checks/check_loan_balance_entries.py 83% 28
audit/intakelib/checks/check_look_for_empty_rows.py 91% 18
audit/intakelib/checks/check_no_major_program_no_type.py 76% 18 27
audit/intakelib/checks/check_no_repeat_findings.py 76% 21 30
audit/intakelib/checks/check_other_cluster_names.py 81% 23 33
audit/intakelib/checks/check_passthrough_name_when_no_direct.py 88% 9 47
audit/intakelib/checks/check_sequential_award_numbers.py 82% 25 35
audit/intakelib/checks/check_start_and_end_rows_of_all_columns_are_same.py 89% 14
audit/intakelib/checks/check_state_cluster_names.py 81% 23 33
audit/intakelib/checks/check_version_number.py 73% 21 31-32
audit/intakelib/checks/runners.py 97% 155
audit/intakelib/common/util.py 90% 22 39
audit/intakelib/transforms/xform_rename_additional_notes_sheet.py 81% 14
audit/management/commands/load_fixtures.py 46% 39-45
audit/models/models.py 85% 58 60 65 67 209 215 227 239-242 260 437 455-456 464 486 584-585 589 597 606 612
audit/views/audit_info_form_view.py 27% 25-74 77-117 120-137
audit/views/manage_submission.py 86% 73-80
audit/views/manage_submission_access.py 98% 113-114
audit/views/pre_dissemination_download_view.py 78% 15-16 21-22 29-39
audit/views/submission_progress_view.py 89% 111 176-177
audit/views/tribal_data_consent.py 34% 23-41 44-79
audit/views/unlock_after_certification.py 57% 28-51 73-87
audit/views/upload_report_view.py 26% 32-35 44 91-117 120-170 178-209
audit/views/views.py 53% 74 81-100 123-124 198-199 220-230 257 268-269 280-281 283-287 329-342 345-359 364-377 394-400 405-425 452-456 461-490 533-537 542-562 589-593 598-627 670-674 679-691 694-704 709-721 754-768
census_historical_migration/change_record.py 96% 30 34
census_historical_migration/test_federal_awards_xforms.py 99% 208-209
census_historical_migration/sac_general_lib/audit_information.py 91% 24 78
census_historical_migration/sac_general_lib/cognizant_oversight.py 68% 11
census_historical_migration/sac_general_lib/general_information.py 91% 150-151 159-160 204 275
census_historical_migration/sac_general_lib/sac_creator.py 90% 34
census_historical_migration/sac_general_lib/utils.py 83% 33 60-69
census_historical_migration/transforms/xform_retrieve_uei.py 67% 10
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/additional_eins.py 84% 58-60 67-77
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/additional_ueis.py 77% 27-29 36-46
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/corrective_action_plan.py 81% 40-42 73-89
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/excel_creation_utils.py 65% 99 108-113 118-125 129-147 160-164 178-181
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/federal_awards.py 70% 94-97 268 309-317 327-352 485-576
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/findings.py 27% 40-45 91-111 116-136 149-151 158-179
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/findings_text.py 81% 38-39 70-87
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/notes_to_sefa.py 55% 34-38 101-102 104-105 107-108 135-141 149-157 165-167 172-189 196-232
config/error_handlers.py 94% 22
config/test_settings.py 92% 33-34 49-50
config/urls.py 72% 88
dissemination/file_downloads.py 81% 43-61 91-93
dissemination/forms.py 87% 135 144 255
dissemination/search.py 61% 101 108 110 113-121
dissemination/summary_reports.py 74% 274 300-302 306-310 421 438 459 511-575 601 638-640 663-670
dissemination/test_search.py 93% 51-66 473-474 579-596 608-632 644-669 677-693
dissemination/test_summary_reports.py 98%
dissemination/views.py 76% 134 140-142 159-223 266 296 298 332 383 385 387 465-470
dissemination/migrations/0002_general_fac_accepted_date.py 47% 10-12
dissemination/searchlib/search_alns.py 37% 44-58 78-110 115-177 184-187
dissemination/searchlib/search_direct_funding.py 86% 21-22
dissemination/searchlib/search_findings.py 76% 18-24 34 36 38
dissemination/searchlib/search_general.py 96% 138
dissemination/searchlib/search_passthrough_name.py 35% 21-31
djangooidc/backends.py 78% 32 57-63
djangooidc/exceptions.py 66% 19 21 23 28
djangooidc/oidc.py 16% 32-35 45-51 64-70 92-149 153-199 203-226 230-275 280-281 286
djangooidc/views.py 81% 22 43 109-110 117
djangooidc/tests/common.py 97%
report_submission/forms.py 92% 35
report_submission/views.py 78% 86 225 249-250 255-256 296-442 445-455
report_submission/templatetags/get_attr.py 76% 8 11-14 18
support/admin.py 88% 76 79 84 91-97 100-102
support/cog_over.py 91% 30-33 93 145
support/test_admin_api.py 81% 23 147-148 237-238 317-318
support/test_cog_over.py 98% 134-135 224
support/management/commands/seed_cog_baseline.py 98% 20-21
support/models/cog_over.py 89% 103-104
tools/update_program_data.py 89% 96
users/admin.py 99% 27
users/auth.py 96% 58-59
users/models.py 96% 18 74-75
users/fixtures/user_fixtures.py 91%

Minimum allowed coverage is 85%

Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against ebae523

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 10, 2024

Terraform plan for meta

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.s3-backups.cloudfoundry_service_instance.bucket,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/s3-backups/s3/main.tf line 14, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "bucket":
  14:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

✅ Plan applied in Deploy to Development and Management Environment #615

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 10, 2024

Terraform plan for dev

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.dev.module.cg-logshipper.module.s3-logshipper-storage.cloudfoundry_service_instance.bucket,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/dev.cg-logshipper.s3-logshipper-storage/s3/main.tf line 14, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "bucket":
  14:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

(and 3 more similar warnings elsewhere)

✅ Plan applied in Deploy to Development and Management Environment #615

@jperson1 jperson1 requested a review from a team April 10, 2024 17:57
@jperson1 jperson1 marked this pull request as ready for review April 10, 2024 17:57
@jperson1 jperson1 changed the title [DRAFT] More Advanced Search Parameters & HTML Refactor More Advanced Search Parameters & HTML Refactor Apr 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@phildominguez-gsa phildominguez-gsa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works well! Minor suggestions, take them or leave them.

backend/dissemination/forms.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
backend/dissemination/forms.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jadudm jadudm added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 06e3986 Apr 12, 2024
13 checks passed
@jadudm jadudm deleted the jp/search-filter-refactor branch April 12, 2024 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants