Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Acceptance of alternative template formats #157

Closed
anweiss opened this issue Jul 13, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Acceptance of alternative template formats #157

anweiss opened this issue Jul 13, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@anweiss
Copy link

@anweiss anweiss commented Jul 13, 2017

Is the Word doc template for Tailored published under Appendix B the only accepted format? If all of the required information as outlined by this template is delivered via an alternative format (e.g. GitBook, web pages, etc), would that be acceptable? If not, would the submission of the content in an alternative format, in addition to the Word doc, be acceptable?

@thecapacity
Copy link
Contributor

@thecapacity thecapacity commented Jul 13, 2017

👋 Hi @anweiss thanks for the question - we're trying to figure that out right now!!

i.e. currently Word/Excel are the official formats, but it didn't make sense to try to recreate the tables in Markdown for the webpage, so we created .csv files to leverage GitHub's native viewer.

@thecapacity
Copy link
Contributor

@thecapacity thecapacity commented Jul 13, 2017

Right now we don't have the capability for an alternate submission (e.g. web harvesting) but I'd love to hear your thoughts on how we might do that

@anweiss
Copy link
Author

@anweiss anweiss commented Jul 13, 2017

Awesome! Thinking in terms of OpenControl, OSCAL, 3rd-party tooling, CSP's own tools, etc, etc that are used to create the alternatively-formatted document and then publishing it to whatever platform is deemed appropriate for distribution when an agency submits a package access request.

@thecapacity
Copy link
Contributor

@thecapacity thecapacity commented Jul 13, 2017

@anweiss yea - what I'd really like to be able to do is;

  1. Generate "official templates" internally to the PMO - i.e. for better/worse right now Gov still needs Excel/Word/PDF style outputs for review

  2. Create some sort of "generic" mechanism - e.g. "send a completed copy of this CSV to the following URL via POST and we will automatically do 1 on your behalf" --- like a modern day fax-machine

Then figure out how to iterate 1+2 together to get v 3++

What do you think?

@anweiss
Copy link
Author

@anweiss anweiss commented Jul 13, 2017

I like it! I think it's a good start, at least until the various tools, formats, specs, etc out in the open mature.

@rhoesing rhoesing removed the question label Jul 14, 2017
@thecapacity thecapacity added the idea label Jul 14, 2017
@JJediny
Copy link
Member

@JJediny JJediny commented Jul 19, 2017

reference: 18F/fedramp-dashboard#72

@FedRAMP FedRAMP closed this Sep 22, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
4 participants