Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion, rotor's #1618

Closed
Ghengis88 opened this issue Jul 5, 2017 · 11 comments
Closed

Suggestion, rotor's #1618

Ghengis88 opened this issue Jul 5, 2017 · 11 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@Ghengis88
Copy link

i suggest changing the cost of making rotors in assembling machine from 16 molten tin to 18 molten tin.
This is becous there is no easy way to get 16, (bolt's are 18, wires are 72) so there will always be some leftover fluid in the assembling machine, only way around this is making 9 rotors, 9*16=144 and then you use 1 ingot, otherwise you sooner or later need to pull you plunger out and clean up.
making the cost 18 would make construktion of rotors much more simple and less time consuming, even tho making it cost "more",

@Dream-Master
Copy link
Member

sure.

@Dream-Master
Copy link
Member

I think you mean molten Alloy, Tin and lead. I change it to 18, 36 and 54.

@Dream-Master Dream-Master self-assigned this Jul 5, 2017
Dream-Master added a commit to GTNewHorizons/GT5-Unofficial that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2017
@Dream-Master Dream-Master added this to the 1.6.0.0 milestone Jul 5, 2017
@MineAnPlay
Copy link
Contributor

Change it back :P. Use tiny piles of dusts.

@Dream-Master
Copy link
Member

@MineAnPlay Seriously ?

@MineAnPlay
Copy link
Contributor

Well you could keep change it if you want.

@Dream-Master
Copy link
Member

What is right 16 or 18 ?

@Bryfer
Copy link

Bryfer commented Jul 9, 2017

I agree with ghengis on this one.

All other recipes inside the assembling machine is following the same logic. 1-4ingots, 1/2 ingot, 1/4 ingot, 1/8 ingot etc.
While the rotor is using 1/9 of an ingot(tiny pile, nugget). But it's really annoying to have that little bit of tin/lead/alloy inside the machine after using it.
By changing​ the recipe to change 1/8 instead it will reduce alot of annoying plumbing of assembling machines.

I'm aware that some people has dedicated tin/lead/alloy assembling machines.

Anyway. I really think that all the recipies should follow the same logic system. Which the rotor in assembling machines does not. There might be more recipies not following this logic aswell. But none of them is comming to my mind right now. If there is more recipies, then I think these should be changed aswell.

@Dream-Master
Copy link
Member

@Bryfer thanks for feedback

@kris449
Copy link

kris449 commented Jul 9, 2017

Yes, I explained this to mineanplay also, he just likes to be difficult.

@Drobac
Copy link
Contributor

Drobac commented Jul 9, 2017

Agreed with Ghengis and Bryfer, small change but saves on resources

@Dream-Master
Copy link
Member

k

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants