-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 275
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggestion, rotor's #1618
Comments
|
sure. |
|
I think you mean molten Alloy, Tin and lead. I change it to 18, 36 and 54. |
|
Change it back :P. Use tiny piles of dusts. |
|
@MineAnPlay Seriously ? |
|
Well you could keep change it if you want. |
|
What is right 16 or 18 ? |
|
I agree with ghengis on this one. All other recipes inside the assembling machine is following the same logic. 1-4ingots, 1/2 ingot, 1/4 ingot, 1/8 ingot etc. I'm aware that some people has dedicated tin/lead/alloy assembling machines. Anyway. I really think that all the recipies should follow the same logic system. Which the rotor in assembling machines does not. There might be more recipies not following this logic aswell. But none of them is comming to my mind right now. If there is more recipies, then I think these should be changed aswell. |
|
@Bryfer thanks for feedback |
|
Yes, I explained this to mineanplay also, he just likes to be difficult. |
|
Agreed with Ghengis and Bryfer, small change but saves on resources |
|
k |
i suggest changing the cost of making rotors in assembling machine from 16 molten tin to 18 molten tin.
This is becous there is no easy way to get 16, (bolt's are 18, wires are 72) so there will always be some leftover fluid in the assembling machine, only way around this is making 9 rotors, 9*16=144 and then you use 1 ingot, otherwise you sooner or later need to pull you plunger out and clean up.
making the cost 18 would make construktion of rotors much more simple and less time consuming, even tho making it cost "more",
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: