Skip to content

Conversation

@greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

babel-eslint just published its new version 6.1.2.

State Failing tests ⚠️
Dependency babel-eslint
New version 6.1.2
Type devDependency

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build kept failing.

It looks like your project, in its current form, is malfunctioning and this update didn’t really change that. I don’t want to leave you in the dark about updates though. I recommend you get your project passing and then check the impact of this update again.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


The new version differs by 7 commits .

  • 9bea6fb 6.1.2
  • e535833 Fix: improve handling of class properties (fixes #337) (#338)
  • 36a6a6d 6.1.1
  • 254e6ea Create a variable for class properties in scope instead of deleting the key (#336)
  • 2d72002 remove hardcoded strict mode value (#331)
  • c7efe11 Add testcase for space-comment and shebang #163
  • 40cb21c Testcase for newline-before-return shouldn't fail with comments. (#300)

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 9, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling e3f536c on greenkeeper-babel-eslint-6.1.2 into dd2bac6 on master.

@Scrum Scrum force-pushed the greenkeeper-babel-eslint-6.1.2 branch from e3f536c to 89a6c34 Compare July 11, 2016 21:02
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 89a6c34 on greenkeeper-babel-eslint-6.1.2 into 6fd3cd2 on master.

@Scrum Scrum force-pushed the greenkeeper-babel-eslint-6.1.2 branch from 89a6c34 to d471211 Compare July 13, 2016 21:39
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 13, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling d471211 on greenkeeper-babel-eslint-6.1.2 into 9f05e48 on master.

@Scrum Scrum force-pushed the greenkeeper-babel-eslint-6.1.2 branch from d471211 to b9de087 Compare July 16, 2016 21:06
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 16, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling b9de087 on greenkeeper-babel-eslint-6.1.2 into a476baf on master.

@Scrum Scrum force-pushed the greenkeeper-babel-eslint-6.1.2 branch from b9de087 to 7574146 Compare July 22, 2016 22:23
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 22, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 7574146 on greenkeeper-babel-eslint-6.1.2 into 870f6d8 on master.

@Scrum Scrum force-pushed the greenkeeper-babel-eslint-6.1.2 branch from 7574146 to e1d3183 Compare July 28, 2016 21:02
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 28, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling e1d3183 on greenkeeper-babel-eslint-6.1.2 into 012bffe on master.

@Scrum Scrum force-pushed the greenkeeper-babel-eslint-6.1.2 branch from e1d3183 to 113a1d4 Compare July 30, 2016 08:32
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 30, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 113a1d4 on greenkeeper-babel-eslint-6.1.2 into bd437ac on master.

@Scrum Scrum force-pushed the greenkeeper-babel-eslint-6.1.2 branch 2 times, most recently from 172c2f7 to fdcc902 Compare August 2, 2016 16:34
@Scrum Scrum merged commit 56f9de0 into master Aug 2, 2016
@Scrum Scrum deleted the greenkeeper-babel-eslint-6.1.2 branch August 2, 2016 16:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants