Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Service does not handle properly the attributes/excludedAttributes parameters #30

Closed
jgomer2001 opened this issue Sep 12, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@jgomer2001
Copy link
Collaborator

commented Sep 12, 2017

Current SCIM implementation does not support the excludedAttributes parameter, but only attributes

See section 3.4.2.5 of RFC 7644. excludedAttributes must support the notation as described in section 3.10 of document mentioned

@jgomer2001 jgomer2001 added the bug label Sep 12, 2017

@jgomer2001 jgomer2001 added this to the CE 3.2 milestone Sep 12, 2017

@jgomer2001 jgomer2001 self-assigned this Sep 12, 2017

@jgomer2001

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

commented Sep 27, 2017

See #35 #36 #37 #38 #40

@jgomer2001 jgomer2001 closed this Sep 27, 2017

@jgomer2001 jgomer2001 reopened this Oct 2, 2017

@jgomer2001 jgomer2001 added enhancement and removed bug labels Oct 2, 2017

@jgomer2001

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

commented Oct 2, 2017

Created new serialization facility that takes into account extended attributes as well. Applies to any instance of class BaseScimResource

New user service interface contains both query params and implementations (like this) must conform to it.

So current service methods (and newer if any) will adhere to section 3.4.2.5 and 3.9 of rfc7644.

@jgomer2001 jgomer2001 closed this Oct 23, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
1 participant
You can’t perform that action at this time.