➡️ Please read Lighthouse Performance Scoring at developer.chrome.com.
All audits in the Best Practices category are equally weighted. Therefore, implementing each audit correctly will increase your overall score by ~6 points.
All audits in the SEO category are equally weighted, with the exception of Structured Data, which is an unscored manual audit. Therefore, implementing each audit correctly will increase your overall score by ~8 points.
The accessibility score is a weighted average. The specific weights for v7 are as follows:
(See the v6 scoring explanation)
audit id | weight |
---|---|
aria-allowed-attr | 4.1% |
aria-hidden-body | 4.1% |
aria-required-attr | 4.1% |
aria-required-children | 4.1% |
aria-required-parent | 4.1% |
aria-roles | 4.1% |
aria-valid-attr-value | 4.1% |
aria-valid-attr | 4.1% |
button-name | 4.1% |
duplicate-id-aria | 4.1% |
image-alt | 4.1% |
input-image-alt | 4.1% |
label | 4.1% |
meta-refresh | 4.1% |
meta-viewport | 4.1% |
video-caption | 4.1% |
accesskeys | 1.2% |
aria-command-name | 1.2% |
aria-hidden-focus | 1.2% |
aria-input-field-name | 1.2% |
aria-meter-name | 1.2% |
aria-progressbar-name | 1.2% |
aria-toggle-field-name | 1.2% |
aria-tooltip-name | 1.2% |
aria-treeitem-name | 1.2% |
bypass | 1.2% |
color-contrast | 1.2% |
definition-list | 1.2% |
dlitem | 1.2% |
document-title | 1.2% |
duplicate-id-active | 1.2% |
frame-title | 1.2% |
html-has-lang | 1.2% |
html-lang-valid | 1.2% |
link-name | 1.2% |
list | 1.2% |
listitem | 1.2% |
object-alt | 1.2% |
tabindex | 1.2% |
td-headers-attr | 1.2% |
th-has-data-cells | 1.2% |
valid-lang | 1.2% |
form-field-multiple-labels | 0.8% |
heading-order | 0.8% |
Each audit is a pass/fail, meaning there is no room for partial points for getting an audit half-right. For example, that means if half your buttons have screenreader friendly names, and half do not, you don't get "half" of the weighted average - you get a 0 because it needs to be implemented correctly throughout the page.