You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Nevertheless, the manifest has a name that is short already (11 characters): “El Soberano”.
The page still is offered to be installed as a PWA in Chrome, so this is not actually blocking the installability.
What is the expected behavior?
If the short_name is absent and the name is less than 12 characters (the recommended length) then nothing should be raised as an issue.
If the name is longer than 12 characters, then the Lighthouse audit should say something like, “The name is longer than 12 characters so a short_name is required.”
This makes sense to me. I understand Chrome and Firefox don't explicitly require a short_name, (or even a short name), so I don't quite understand why this is an "Installable" check. Also, feels safe to assume that no other PWA installable platforms are hard-checking this.
westonruter
changed the title
"Manifest does not have short_name" failure even though the name is <12 characters
“Manifest does not have short_name” failure even though the name is <12 characters
Nov 27, 2019
Provide the steps to reproduce
What is the current behavior?
The PWA audit flags the absence of
short_name
:Nevertheless, the manifest has a
name
that is short already (11 characters): “El Soberano”.The page still is offered to be installed as a PWA in Chrome, so this is not actually blocking the installability.
What is the expected behavior?
If the
short_name
is absent and thename
is less than 12 characters (the recommended length) then nothing should be raised as an issue.If the
name
is longer than 12 characters, then the Lighthouse audit should say something like, “Thename
is longer than 12 characters so ashort_name
is required.”Environment Information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: