Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

spec2006 fp test failed with 416.gamess and 481.wrf #1120

Open
xiahaihong opened this issue Sep 27, 2016 · 9 comments
Open

spec2006 fp test failed with 416.gamess and 481.wrf #1120

xiahaihong opened this issue Sep 27, 2016 · 9 comments

Comments

@xiahaihong
Copy link

@xiahaihong xiahaihong commented Sep 27, 2016

when i ran with --benchmark_subset=fp --benchmarks=speccpu2006 and use "linux64-x64-gcc47.cfg" file according to #156
it's ok with int test, but when ran fp test, i got errors as follows

2016-09-23 03:34:43,794 b89859e8 MainThread speccpu2006(1/1) vm_util.py:312 INFO Ran ssh -A -p 22 ubuntu@xx.xx.xx.xx -2 -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o IdentitiesOnly=yes -o PreferredAuthentications=publickey -o PasswordAuthentication=no -o ConnectTimeout=5 -o GSSAPIAuthentication=no -o ServerAliveInterval=30 -o ServerAliveCountMax=10 -i /tmp/perfkitbenchmarker/runs/b89859e8/perfkitbenchmarker_keyfile cat /scratch/cpu2006/result/CFP2006.001.ref.txt. Got return code (0).
STDOUT:
INVALID RUN -- INVALID RUN -- INVALID RUN -- INVALID RUN -- INVALID RUN #
#
'reportable' flag not set during run #
416.gamess (base) had invalid runs! #
481.wrf (base) had invalid runs! #
Run of 416.gamess (base) was not valid; status is VE #
Run of 481.wrf (base) was not valid; status is RE #
Unknown flags were used! See #
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/Docs/runspec.html#flagsurl #
for information about how to get rid of this error. #
Error 416.gamess: Output miscompare #
Error 416.gamess: Output miscompare #
Error 416.gamess: Output miscompare #
Error 481.wrf: copy 0 non-zero return code (exit code=2, signal=0) #
Error 481.wrf: copy 6 non-zero return code (exit code=2, signal=0) #
Error 481.wrf: copy 4 non-zero return code (exit code=2, signal=0) #
Error 481.wrf: copy 7 non-zero return code (exit code=2, signal=0) #
Error 481.wrf: copy 5 non-zero return code (exit code=2, signal=0) #
Error 481.wrf: copy 2 non-zero return code (exit code=2, signal=0) #
Error 481.wrf: copy 1 non-zero return code (exit code=2, signal=0) #
Error 481.wrf: copy 3 non-zero return code (exit code=2, signal=0) #
Error 481.wrf: copy 0 non-zero return code (exit code=2, signal=0) #
Error 481.wrf: copy 1 non-zero return code (exit code=2, signal=0) #
Error 481.wrf: copy 6 non-zero return code (exit code=2, signal=0) #
Error 481.wrf: copy 4 non-zero return code (exit code=2, signal=0) #_

@xiahaihong

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@xiahaihong xiahaihong commented Sep 27, 2016

it's ok with int

@xiahaihong

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@xiahaihong xiahaihong commented Sep 27, 2016

ubuntu@iZ11kyp5a8uZ:/scratch/cpu2006/benchspec/CPU2006/416.gamess/run/run_base_test_gcc47-64bit.0000$ cat exam29.out.mis
0423:     1  0  0     -228.438026762  -228.438026762   0.585016182   0.000000000
          1  0  0     -228.438026762  -228.438026762   2.057216987   0.000000000
                                                                 ^
0424:            ---------------START SECOND ORDER SCF---------------
          2  1  0      -13.398272306   215.039754456   0.019611730   2.138165837
       ^
0425:     2  1  0     -228.975183270    -0.537156507   0.141897260   0.111481465
                 ---------------START SECOND ORDER SCF---------------
       ^
0426:     3  2  0     -229.014081256    -0.038897986   0.064028396   0.079634004
          3  2  0      -13.404086244    -0.005813938   0.000644098   0.008801378
                                   ^
0427:     4  3  0     -229.036210679    -0.022129423   0.025840433   0.007697238
          4  3  0      -13.404093666    -0.000007422   0.000028154   0.000448854
                                   ^
0428:     5  4  0     -229.036777024    -0.000566345   0.008639408   0.001874192
          5  4  0      -13.404093683    -0.000000017   0.000000370   0.000004470
                                   ^
0429:     6  5  0     -229.036824895    -0.000047871   0.001734717   0.000979860
          6  5  0      -13.404093683    -0.000000000   0.000000008   0.000000051
                                   ^
0431:     7  6  0     -229.036831711    -0.000006816   0.000315932   0.000297576
                 -----------------
       ^
0432:     8  7  0     -229.036832335    -0.000000624   0.000112760   0.000083271
                 DENSITY CONVERGED
       ^
0433:     9  8  0     -229.036832426    -0.000000092   0.000074046   0.000042607
                 -----------------
       ^
@xiahaihong

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@xiahaihong xiahaihong commented Sep 27, 2016

ubuntu@iZ11kyp5a8uZ:/scratch/cpu2006/benchspec/CPU2006/481.wrf/run/run_base_ref_gcc47-64bit.0000$ cat wrf.err
At line 6744 of file module_ra_rrtm.fppized.f90 (unit = 10, file = 'RRTM_DATA')
Fortran runtime error: End of file
@xiahaihong xiahaihong changed the title spec2006 fp test failed spec2006 fp test failed with 416.gamess and 481.wrf Sep 28, 2016
@xiahaihong

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@xiahaihong xiahaihong commented Sep 28, 2016

@voellm, can you help to give some advice, thanks a lot

@hildrum

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@hildrum hildrum commented Sep 28, 2016

Does this happen repeatedly?

@xiahaihong

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@xiahaihong xiahaihong commented Sep 29, 2016

yes, @hildrum ,I have run 3 times, and happens every time

@xiahaihong

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@xiahaihong xiahaihong commented Sep 29, 2016

pkb.log is attached
pkb.log.speccpu.txt

@xiahaihong

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@xiahaihong xiahaihong commented Oct 8, 2016

hi, @hildrum , have you seen the pkb.log attached, is there anything I can do ?

@hildrum

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@hildrum hildrum commented Oct 9, 2016

I did look, and it didn't look like something easy to debug. There are other people who report problems with those benchmarks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.