Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
pytest-asyncio (changelog) ==0.23.5 -> ==0.23.6 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

pytest-dev/pytest-asyncio (pytest-asyncio)

v0.23.6

Compare Source

v0.23.5.post1: pytest-asyncio 0.23.5.post1

Compare Source

0.23.5 (2024-02-09)

  • Declare compatibility with pytest 8 #​737
  • Fix typing errors with recent versions of mypy #​769
  • Prevent DeprecationWarning about internal use of asyncio.get_event_loop() from affecting test cases #​757

Known issues

As of v0.23, pytest-asyncio attaches an asyncio event loop to each item of the test suite (i.e. session, packages, modules, classes, functions) and allows tests to be run in those loops when marked accordingly. Pytest-asyncio currently assumes that async fixture scope is correlated with the new event loop scope. This prevents fixtures from being evaluated independently from the event loop scope and breaks some existing test suites (see #​706). For example, a test suite may require all fixtures and tests to run in the same event loop, but have async fixtures that are set up and torn down for each module. If you're affected by this issue, please continue using the v0.21 release, until it is resolved.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@jackwotherspoon jackwotherspoon merged commit 088b128 into GoogleCloudPlatform:main Mar 19, 2024
@renovate-bot renovate-bot deleted the renovate/pytest-asyncio-0.x branch March 19, 2024 12:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants