Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Index retention exception #1882

edmundoa opened this issue Mar 2, 2016 · 0 comments

Index retention exception #1882

edmundoa opened this issue Mar 2, 2016 · 0 comments


Copy link

@edmundoa edmundoa commented Mar 2, 2016

Problem description

Using the current master, I'm getting these in my logs now:

2016-03-02 18:50:59,731 INFO : org.graylog2.indexer.retention.strategies.AbstractIndexCountBasedRetentionStrategy - Number of indices (24) higher than limit (Optional.of(20)). Running retention for 4 indices.
2016-03-02 18:50:59,731 ERROR: org.graylog2.periodical.IndexRetentionThread - Uncaught exception in periodical
    at org.graylog2.indexer.Deflector.extractIndexNumber( ~[classes/:?]
    at org.graylog2.indexer.IndexHelper.getOldestIndices( ~[classes/:?]
    at org.graylog2.indexer.retention.strategies.AbstractIndexCountBasedRetentionStrategy.runRetention( ~[classes/:?]
    at org.graylog2.indexer.retention.strategies.AbstractIndexCountBasedRetentionStrategy.retain( ~[classes/:?]
    at org.graylog2.periodical.IndexRetentionThread.doRun( ~[classes/:?]
    at [classes/:?]
    at java.util.concurrent.Executors$ [?:1.8.0_74]
    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset( [?:1.8.0_74]
    at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301( [?:1.8.0_74]
    at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ [?:1.8.0_74]
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker( [?:1.8.0_74]
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$ [?:1.8.0_74]
    at [?:1.8.0_74]


  • Graylog Version: 2.0.0-alpha.5
@edmundoa edmundoa added the bug label Mar 2, 2016
@edmundoa edmundoa added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Mar 2, 2016
@joschi joschi self-assigned this Mar 2, 2016
joschi pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2016
@bernd bernd closed this in #1888 Mar 4, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants