Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UI issues when decorator replaces field value #2591

bernd opened this issue Aug 3, 2016 · 1 comment

UI issues when decorator replaces field value #2591

bernd opened this issue Aug 3, 2016 · 1 comment


Copy link

@bernd bernd commented Aug 3, 2016

Problem description

There are some issue when using a decorator that is replacing a field value.


  1. The field name entry sidebar does not indicate that the value has been modified
  2. The message details still show the magnifier to search for the value and the actions menu

When you click the magnifier icon, the changed value will be added to the search bar. This will not work because the value will not be found in ES.

Steps to reproduce the problem

  1. Configure and add a decorator that replaces a field value (i.e. pipeline decorator with a pipeline and rule that overwrites a field)
  2. Check the field in the sidebar: there is no indication that it's generated/modified
  3. Check the message details: the field name has the modified marker, but it's still possible to search for this value and run other actions from the action menu


  • Graylog Version: 2.1.0-beta.2-SNAPSHOT (581eb1f)
  • Browser version: Chrome 52
@bernd bernd added the web label Aug 3, 2016
@edmundoa edmundoa self-assigned this Aug 3, 2016
@edmundoa edmundoa added this to the 2.1.0 milestone Aug 3, 2016
@kroepke kroepke added bug S2 P2 labels Aug 8, 2016
Copy link

@edmundoa edmundoa commented Aug 10, 2016

Fixed in #2654

@edmundoa edmundoa closed this Aug 10, 2016
@kroepke kroepke added triaged and removed triaged labels Sep 21, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
3 participants