New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Indices not following rotation policy #3268
Comments
Thanks for testing the beta release! We will take a look at this asap. |
@freebsdsa I am unable to reproduce this with the current beta.3 snapshot. Can you please send us your Graylog server log and the output of the following command executed on your server?
Thanks! |
Here is the output from that command.
I also attached the full server log. |
@freebsdsa Thanks for the logs and the index set data! The index set configuration looks good but I can't find anything in the logs that indicates an error with the index rotation. Since I am unable to reproduce this with the current master, please update to beta.3 or wait for beta.4 which will be release this week. Please let us know if it works once you updated, thanks! I will leave this ticket open. |
I can confirm this issue on beta.3! I have created two additional index sets which do not get rotated:
Please advise on how I can provide additional info in order to support. Best regards |
I couldn't reproduce this on current @freebsdsa @tokred Make sure that you've assigned the correct index sets to your streams and retry with the latest beta. Graylog 2.2.0-beta.4 should be released today. If the problem still exists there for you, please add a comment in this issue. Until then, I'll close this as neither @bernd nor I could reproduce it. |
Aaand open again. Looks like this is a problem with We'll try to fix it for the next beta. |
I am testing Graylog 2.2 Beta and am using a stream to pull certain message types into its own ES indices so that we can have a different retention policy. I noticed that the new indices are not rotating per day as I have set it up to do, but the default ones rotate just fine.
Both indices show the same setup index time and P1D.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: