Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve handling of Elasticsearch indices #2062

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 13, 2016
Merged

Improve handling of Elasticsearch indices #2062

merged 1 commit into from Apr 13, 2016

Conversation

@bernd
Copy link
Member

@bernd bernd commented Apr 12, 2016

  • Make sure to only return Graylog indices in the indices and indices
    overview resources.
  • Until we find a better solution, hard code the index suffix for restored
    archive indices to make it possible to search in restored indices and
    close/delete them.

Fixes #2058

@bernd bernd added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Apr 12, 2016
- Make sure to only return Graylog indices in the indices and indices
  overview resources.
- Until we find a better solution, hard code the index suffix for restored
  archive indices to make it possible to search in restored indices and
  close/delete them.

Fixes #2058
@bernd bernd force-pushed the fix-issue-2058 branch from 56cb781 to 3273a9d Apr 13, 2016
@joschi joschi self-assigned this Apr 13, 2016
@joschi
Copy link
Contributor

@joschi joschi commented Apr 13, 2016

LGTM. 👍

@joschi joschi merged commit 37cf61c into master Apr 13, 2016
4 checks passed
4 checks passed
@garybot2
ci-server-integration Jenkins build graylog2-server-integration-pr 820 has succeeded
Details
@garybot2
ci-web-linter Jenkins build graylog-pr-linter-check 309 has succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build passed
Details
@joschi joschi deleted the fix-issue-2058 branch Apr 13, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants