Gytis Trikleris gytis

Organizations

@jbossas @jbosstm
@gytis
@gytis
gytis deleted branch JBTM-2365-Narayana-features-comparison at gytis/narayana.io
@gytis
  • @gytis 6076766
    [JBTM-2365] Narayana features comparison table
gytis merged pull request jbosstm/narayana.io#1
@gytis
JBTM-2365. Narayana features comparison table
1 commit with 272 additions and 92 deletions
gytis created repository gytis/ci-report-generator
gytis commented on pull request jbosstm/narayana.io#1
@gytis

Already removed it

@gytis
  • @gytis 6076766
    [JBTM-2365] Narayana features comparison table
@gytis
  • @gytis 6f44816
    [JBTM-2365] Narayana features comparison table
gytis commented on pull request jbosstm/narayana.io#1
@gytis

Well, I can remove it in that case.

@gytis
  • @gytis 09f0d97
    [JBTM-2444] Update JMS config to work with ActiveMQ
gytis commented on pull request jbosstm/quickstart#142
@gytis

Seems that they're planning to implement backwards compatibility https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-4586

gytis commented on pull request jbosstm/quickstart#142
@gytis

Seems that it doesn't automatically provide JMS API by scanning the deployment. Therefore, JMSException class is not found. I've updated https://gi…

gytis commented on pull request jbosstm/quickstart#142
@gytis

Rebuilding WildFly locally to see if adding messaging-activemq fixes the problem.

gytis commented on pull request jbosstm/quickstart#142
@gytis

Yeah I've noticed that. I've commented on WFLY-4584, to check with Jeff.

gytis commented on pull request jbosstm/quickstart#142
@gytis

JTA 1.2 test passed now. But REST-AT bridge test failed, which also uses JMS.

gytis opened pull request jbosstm/quickstart#142
@gytis
[JBTM-2444] Update JMS config to work with ActiveMQ
1 commit with 4 additions and 4 deletions
@gytis
  • @gytis 400831f
    [JBTM-2365] Narayana features comparison table
gytis commented on pull request jbosstm/narayana.io#1
@gytis

But in RTS and XTS http calls still would be executed. My explanation of local transaction wasn't very good... For example compensations have two m…

gytis commented on pull request jbosstm/narayana.io#1
@gytis

I meant the transaction where all parties and calls are in the same container. Is the a better name for that?

gytis commented on pull request jbosstm/narayana.io#1
@gytis

Removed which standard? If you mean XATMI, it's not removed, "-" marks array entry.

gytis pushed to master at gytis/narayana
@gytis
@gytis
@gytis
@gytis
gytis created branch master at gytis/ci-report
gytis created repository gytis/ci-report